|
Women's Sexual Health
Section
Six degrees of contraception
Are menstrual monitoring devices
a viable alternative for the Pill � or just a fancy
way of marketing the rhythm method?
By Susan Orr-Mongeau
At 25, Letitia Larivee decided
it was time to trash the Pill and started shopping around
for a new method of contraception. She figured since
she was newly married, health-conscious, and financially
secure she could take the chance on an alternative �
and hormone-free � birth control. She eventually settled
on a menstrual cycle monitoring device called Lady-Comp.
Seven years later, at 32, she's still thrilled with
her choice. "I think it's great. There are no pills
and none of the guesswork of the manual charting methods,"
she says.
The temperature device basically
applies the rules of the body temperature method but
uses a mini-computer to record and store data. A woman
takes her body temperature orally using a temperature
sensitive probe that's connected to a small computer
and then enters information about her menstrual dates
which are compared with more than 700,000 other cycles
stored in the computer. A calculation is done that predicts
fertility for the next 24 hours (and the following 6
days) by displaying a colour; red is fertile and green
is infertile.
Ms Larivee isn't alone in her quest
to get off the ever-popular oral contraceptive (OC),
currently used by 32% of sexually-active women. Many
women get fed up with the weight-gain, and breast cancer
and HRT stories in the news have made many of them worry
about taking hormones. But natural methods of birth
control are still relatively unpopular in Canada; withdrawal
accounts for 6% and the Vatican's favourite, the rhythm
method, gets a mere 2% following � probably due to its
notorious unreliability. There are no stats available
on how many Canadian women are using monitoring devices.
A
SCEPTIC'S VIEW
Vancouver Ob/Gyn Dr Timothy Rowe, one of the principal
authors of the new practice guidelines for contraception
from the Society of Obstetricians and Gyneacologists
of Canada, isn't especially keen on these monitors.
"They're just a grand extension of BBT [basal body temperature],"
he says. "They're using indirect indices of ovulation,
which don't reliably predict ovulation."
These types of monitors have been
on store shelves in Europe for about 15 years and seven
years in Canada, but their efficacy varies tremendously
� as do their price tags. The monitors can run anywhere
from $175 to $600. There's also an inconvenience issue
� since a woman is usually fertile about eight days
out of each month, she and her partner are forced to
use another contraception, preferably a barrier method
like condom or diaphragm.
Dr Rowe adds that he wouldn't recommend
the menstrual cycle monitors to his patients because,
"There's very little scientific evidence available on
these devices." A recent German study published in Journal
of Human Reproduction has partially filled this
gap. The study found that about 10% to 15% of women
of reproductive age in Europe use variations of natural
family planning methods. An estimated 30% to 40% of
those women are relying on some type of menstrual cycle
monitor to detect their fertility window, usually for
birth control purposes, but also sometimes to optimize
their chances of conceiving (incidentally, Lady-Comp's
manufacturers also market a virtually identical fertility
monitor called Baby-Comp).
The research team, led by emeritus
professor Dr Guenter Freundl, tested three types of
monitors in their pilot study involving 62 women and
a total of 122 menstrual cycles. They found that monitors
based on microscopic evaluation of saliva or cervical
mucus showed higher rates of falsely indicating infertile
days than the temperature or hormonal computers. The
three temperature monitors tested performed reasonably
well with 1.7%, 4.7% and 7.5% false negatives.
NOT
FOR FORGETFUL JANES
Like most contraceptive methods, reliability depends
on correct and consistent use. Considering the high
failure rate of these monitors � basically a high-tech
form of the rhythm method � they're probably only for
your mature, educated, disciplined and wealthy patients
who want to get off the hormone treadmill. But advise
them to keep a pack of Trojans by the bedside, just
in case.
|