Opinion
Out on
the fringe
Many physicians feel that in addition
to negotiating a cost-of-living increase, the time is
ripe to push for enhanced fringe benefits � something
many of our patients already enjoy.
Precedents for some fringe benefits
already exist. Many western provinces subsidize continuing
medical education and at least one matches RRSP contributions.
Near-total reimbursement for the cost of malpractice
coverage through the CMPA is available across the country.
In the past, provincial medical
associations were reluctant to negotiate further fringe
benefits. Most of them kept their membership numbers
up by offering group life and disability insurance.
With the Rand formula � in use in Ontario, Manitoba,
New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island,
and which mandates payment of dues by all physicians
� this is no longer an issue.
At least six provinces face deficits
this year. Provincial governments are using this as
an excuse to stonewall physicians. But it's na�ve and
short-sighted on our part to refuse to discuss fringe
benefits on the grounds that we are self-employed entrepreneurs
and not civil servants. We must recognize the fact that
our fees and total incomes are essentially dictated
by one paymaster � the provincial government. If we
are to achieve anything above token cost-of-living fee
increases, it must be by pushing for fringe benefits
now.
Such benefits would entail a relatively
low short-term cost, and would thus have a negligible
effect on the provincial deficit. In contrast to fee
increases, which could subsequently be clawed back,
these benefits would be politically very difficult to
rescind.
� Dr Charles S Shaver
|