MAY 2008
VOLUME 5 NO. 5

PATIENTS & PRACTICE

Screen for breast CA past 70

Two studies find definitive benefits if women keep going for mammograms


Smaller tumours more aggressive past 70

Contrary to common wisdom that tumour aggressiveness slows with age, some breast cancers actually worsen in women over 70, according to Belgian researchers presenting to the European Breast Cancer Conference in Berlin. The likelihood of spread to the lymph nodes decreases as a woman ages, but once she passes the 70 year mark, the odds of lymph node involvement doubles with every decade — but only if the tumour is no more than 15mm across. For growths larger than 40 mm, aggressiveness continues to decline with age.

The authors speculate that their observations reflect a decline in the women's immune defence that goes hand in hand with aging. While tumour aggressiveness may continue to lessen with advanced age, this effect could be offset — especially for small tumours — by a weakened immune response in the above-70s.

The guidelines are quite specific on how often women should be screened for breast cancer — at least once every two years until the age of 70. But what happens after 70? So far, there have been no clear recommendations. "After age 70, it's basically left up to the physician what kind of screening to recommend," says Dr Ellen Warner, medical oncologist at the Odette Cancer Centre in Toronto.

This may soon change, however. Two major new studies have found clear benefits when women continued to go for regular mammograms after 70. The first study, published ahead of print April 21 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, evaluated breast cancer diagnoses in more than 12,000 women over 80 and related the stage of the cancers to how regularly the patients had gone for mammograms during the preceding 60 months. The second study, presented at the European Breast Cancer Conference in Berlin last month, assessed the effect of an over-70 screening program in the Netherlands on breast cancer-related deaths.

SENIOR SCREENING
The authors of the first study, conducted at M D Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, found that in those who went for regular screening, breast cancers were diagnosed at an earlier disease stage. In step with this observation, breast-cancer specific five-year survival jumped from 82% for women who didn't get any screening done to 94% for those who had regular mammograms. Patients who underwent screening at irregular intervals had a five-year survival of 88%. Since the most benefit was seen for regular use of mammography, the authors conclude that their results support screening at intervals of one to two years in this age group.

This is the first time that such recommendations can be made on the basis of hard data. Indeed, the current lack of explicit guidelines is a direct result of the fact that most trials and studies to date have excluded women older than 69. "The new evidence should help physicians to be more assertive when recommending screening to women over 70," says Dr Warner. "If a woman is healthy at age 70, she has a life expectancy of 15 years, so it's well worth doing the screening."

In addition to the cancer stats, the research yielded a surprising result regarding breast cancer-unrelated survival in women over the age of 80: the five-year survival rate was 59% for those who didn't go for regular mammograms, and 80% for women who did. The authors were unable to separate this effect from the trend seen in breast cancer-specific survival, so they concede there may be a bias for healthier patients to undergo more regular screening.

The Dutch study appears to confirm what the American researchers found. It showed that breast-cancer related deaths fell by 30% in the Netherlands after the upper age limit for screening was extended to 75 there. The new guidelines took effect in 1998, and researchers from the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam decided to look at data from 2003 onwards to see whether there was an observable effect. They found that deaths from breast cancer were steadily declining in women aged 75-79, i.e. the bracket where improvements in survival would be expected. Between 1986 and 1997, roughly 166 per 100,000 women in this age group died of breast cancer per year. In 2006, that number was down to 117.

Until guidelines catch up with the research, Canadian physicians will just have to play it by ear. "In terms of comorbidity, the treating physician has to decide on an individual basis what kind of screening is appropriate," says Dr Warner. "If a woman isn't able to undergo mammography, you can still do a clinical breast exam."

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.