Please
note: This online version includes extra material that
did not appear in the print version.
Congratulations
on winning the Saskatchewan nomination. How do you feel?
Relieved. No, obviously, I'm pleased this is the
outcome and look forward to the challenges over the
next three years.
You were the only woman in the
race. Did you see yourself as the Hillary Clinton of
the CMA race? No. And I don't think my husband would
like to be compared to Bill, either.
Was it uncomfortable running
against several of your colleagues on the Saskatchewan
Medical Association board of directors? I know every
single one of the six people who were running with me,
and some of us are currently on the board at the same
time, but there was no real sense of any kind of adversarial
tension at all. We're a bunch of people that get along
very well together and we respect one another's strengths.
We knew whichever one of us got elected would be a good
person. It's all good.
Are you worried that somebody
might decide to challenge you for the CMA presidency
at the annual meeting in Montreal in August? It happened
to current president Brian Day in Charlottetown in 2006.
Well, there was a specific reason that happened. The
bylaws of the CMA permit nominations from the floor
to come forward. Anything could happen. I have no real
reason to expect it, but, you know, it's possible. Typically
in those challenges at the CMA, it takes a fair bit
for the named person to be overthrown. There would have
to be a substantive issue or, God forbid, something
that would come up and besmirch my reputation between
now and then. But if you're asking if I'm reasonably
confident I'll be elected in August, yes I am.
What do you hope to achieve
as CMA president? I'm a family physician, I deal
with patients all day every day and I'm seeing the effects
of systemic problems. It's not just surgical wait times,
it's not just single issues -- I think really Canadians
are just beginning to become aware of a much larger
systemic problem with healthcare that's out there. Really
my goal would be to work with my colleagues as physicians
-- we have always believed it is our responsibility
-- to speak for patients, and not to represent self-interest.
Speaking of self-interest, CMA
delegates in the last two elections chose private clinic
owners as presidents: Brian Day and Robert Ouellet.
Where do you stand on the role of the private sector
in healthcare delivery? There's no single right
answer to that question. We'd be stupid if we didn't
look at alternative solutions. In the same way that
everyone is arguing physicians should accept alternative
payment, we need to look at alternative payment for
whatever we're talking about in terms of healthcare
delivery. That doesn't mean we go out to the insurance
sector and say, okay, we're going to carve off this
piece and give it to you. What it means is we have to
look creatively at how we pay for things, what we are
paying for, why we're paying for it, who's accessing,
who's being denied access, and really take a critical
look at the system's issues behind that. Anywhere you
look in the world where there's a single payer you've
got problems with purchasing power and problems with
access.
Are the provinces and the feds
doing enough to fix the systemic problems you're worried
about, like wait times guarantees? It's positive
that ministries of health are looking at this and saying
we are asking for performance guarantees and we are
willing to put some dollars behind them, but the problem
is they may not have the right things to measure. That's
not to say surgical wait times are not an issue, because
they are, but they're the really sort of catchy issue.
I'll give you an example. A patient
of mine, in his early 40s, has very severe coronary
artery disease. While he was waiting over six months
for an initial consultation with a cardiologist, he
came into the office with a worsening of his angina.
That's disgraceful. But he wasn't urgent enough to justify
me picking up the phone to call the heart guy to say
you've got to see this guy early. That's the hidden
wait. That's an access issue the patient is aware of,
that I'm aware of, but to the folks running the wait
times guarantees, that's an invisible access issue.
Tell me about your father's
involvement in the so-called Medicare Crisis in 1962,
when doctors went on strike to oppose the province's
new medicare system. Well, my dad -- among hundreds
of other physicians -- was a member of what was then
the College of Physicians and Surgeons in Saskatchewan
in the lead-up to the crisis. And, partly because he
was a physician who had fairly recently immigrated to
Canada from Britain [where the National Health Service
was established in 1948], he had some strong opinions
about some of the risks of going into a fully publicly-funded
system and he was certainly vocal in the debates. Having
said that, the debate was not about who should pay physicians.
It's critically important that the primacy of the relationship
between the patient and the physician is maintained
and that the payer, whether it's an insurance company
or the government or some external agency, shouldn't
come between that.
I read that you owned and operated
a grain farm. That farm had been in my husband's
family for 102 years. We sold it this year to, in fact,
another family who homesteaded in the area at the same
time, so we feel as though we didn't quite desert the
farm.
And you've still managed to
find time for swimming. Yes. That's the one sport
I glom onto.
What other things do you do
for fun? A lot of things. I sing in a choir. My
kids have been involved in various branches of music,
mostly piano. My husband plays trumpet in a concert
band. My second youngest son achieved a Nationals qualifying
time in swimming in the last swim meet he was at, so
he'll be going to Nationals, which is Olympic trials.
He's at the bottom of the pile, but that means I'll
be going to Montreal for Olympic trials as an official.
Very cool. Oh, yeah.
Are swimming parents like all
those rabid hockey parents? Swimming's a little
different than that. Most of us who are involved as
parents in that sport have to get out on the deck and
actually work as officials. We don't get to get to sit
on the sidelines and scream at our kids.
In five words or less, how have
you managed to maintain your family practice, run a
grain farm, swim competitively, get involved in medical
politics and have six children? It just happened.
Just kidding, you can use more
than five words. You make time for what interests
you. I've been very fortunate in that my husband is
not a physician, he's a mechanical engineer, so he was
often able to pick up the slack in terms of child care.
And we had a babysitter who was with us for 16 years
and was extraordinarily reliable. Things in that respect
have worked out very well for us. We were very fortunate
our children are healthy and we haven't had to take
a hard look at our parenting responsibilities and say,
"Whoops, I need to focus on something other than
my profession."
Physician health has become
a huge issue. Is that something you're hoping to work
on? You'd have to ask my kids whether they feel
I in any way neglected them.
I was thinking more in terms
of policy. Yeah. We do have to look at the whole
issue of work-life balance as it relates to medical
practice. That is part of why there is going to be a
huge health human resources crisis in the next five
to 10 years. Part of it is the impact of what happened
as a result of Barer-Stoddart, the reductions in admissions
to healthcare over the previous 15 years. We're starting
to see a reversal of that -- medical schools have increased
their enrolments, so have some of the other healthcare
disciplines. I had no choice. There was no such thing
as a maternity benefit for me. With one of the kids,
it was only six weeks after delivery when I went back
to work. I did what I had to do, but I don't think my
kids suffered as a result of and I don't think I suffered
either.
But I do think younger physicians
looking at me and saying, "Good god, girl, you're
crazy. What you did is just not what I want to do."
And that creates some tensions of its own. Obviously
we're going to have to make sure those kinds of issues
are addressed for our younger colleagues. As professionals
we do have to put our professional responsibilities
first and that doesn't mean sacrificing detrimentally
your personal life, but it does mean more of a sacrifice
than someone who is in a more traditional employment
model.
Interview conducted by
Sam Solomon
|