MARCH 2008
VOLUME 5 NO. 3

PATIENTS & PRACTICE

Hospital worst place to have stroke

Inpatients die oftener than those in ED. Better training needed on wards


A patient who presents at hospital with stroke symptoms today is likely to fare much better than he would have done a decade ago. But bizarrely, patients who are already in hospital when their stroke occurs do markedly worse than patients brought in to the ED, according to alarming new Canadian research.

Inpatients wait longer for a brain scan - 61 minutes on average compared to 30 minutes for outpatients. They wait longer for thrombolytic tPA treatment - 138 minutes compared to 75 minutes for outpatients. And they have worse outcomes, with a 30% times greater chance of dying from their stroke, and less chance of recovering full mobility after discharge.

The study that came up with these worrying findings, carried out by the Canadian Stroke Network, was presented on February 20 at the International Stroke Conference in New Orleans. A team led by Dr Frank Silver, a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto, used data from the Canadian Stroke Network registry. It included 12,506 patients with proven acute ischaemic stroke who were admitted to 12 stroke centres in Ontario and Nova Scotia between July 2003 and March 2007. Of these strokes, 535 occurred on a hospital ward.

SLOW MOTION
"You would think that if you were going to have a stroke, there'd be no better place to be than in the hospital," said Dr Silver at the conference. "But what we've found is that it takes longer to get you treated."

Even adjusting for the fact that in-hospital patients are sicker, he said, their post-stroke mortality rate, 14.3%, is higher than that of patients who enter hospital through the ER, at 10.9%.

Most medical and surgical wards don't have constant supervision, points out Dr Silver. Patients may be checked every four to six hours, but that's long enough that the entire window for aggressive thrombolytic treatment can pass by before the stroke is even discovered. Patients may be linked to a heart monitor, but there's no such thing as a stroke monitor on the wards.

Some research suggests that as many as 15% of strokes occur in hospitalized patients. Surgery can dramatically increase the short-term risk of a blood clot. Staff on a neurology ward are likely to be attuned to the risks of stroke, but those on an orthopedic ward, say, often aren't.

"In the ER, there's a well-oiled machine to triage stroke and a CT scanner nearby. But, on a hospital ward, personnel are less likely to expect a stroke," noted Dr Silver. It can take longer to arrange a CT scan in hospital than in the ER, where the machine is typically right there. Sometimes patients must wait for an orderly to bring them to the radiology department. In fact, some hospitals, recognizing the inadequacy of ward arrangements, bring stroke-smitten inpatients to the ED to speed up care.

"What this study shows is that unlike calling 'Code Blue' for a patient with a cardiac arrest there's no system on many hospital wards to call for help when a patient has a stroke," Dr Silver said. "We need to have an education program on non-neurology floors so that hospital personnel know how to recognize an acute stroke and who to call. In-hospital stroke is not that rare."

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.