OCTOBER 15, 2007
VOLUME 4 NO. 17

POLICY & POLITICS

Interprovincial telemedicine
progress stalled

Lack of regulations hinders growth of the field. Doctors frustrated


Technology inevitably advances faster than the regulations designed to govern it, and the growing field of telemedicine is no exception.

In the case of interprovincial telemedicine, however, that phenomenon hasn't spurred growth as it has in other areas, like online video sharing or email spam.

In September, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan began a new effort to fix that, with a proposal to create special licensing that would encourage doctors to practise telemedicine.

DEMAND IS GROWING
Instead, the potential of interprovincial telemedicine in Canada has largely been squandered so far because of a lack of regulatory guidelines that would reassure physicians about liability and licensure issues.

"The regulations in place are mainly to do with intraprovincial activity," says Dr John Carlisle, a health law expert and former deputy registrar of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. "The amount of [telemedicine] activity between provinces is not high enough to make it a priority." But the demand is growing, and regulatory bodies are therefore taking another look.

Despite recommendations made nine years ago by the Federation of Medical Regulatory Authorities of Canada (FMRAC) that provincial Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons should set clear regulations, precious few rules on interprovincial practice are currently in place.

LOCATION OF CARE
Liability remains the biggest concern for doctors doing interprovincial telemedicine because there's no consensus among provinces over how to define where telemedicine treatment is considered to be taking place. "In Quebec and BC, the locus of practice is where the physician is located," says Dr Trevor Cradduck, vice-president of the Canadian Society for Telehealth. In all of the other provinces, the locus is where the patient resides." Without agreement on that, interprovincial "visits" raise prohibitive concerns about jurisdiction and liability.

Other health professionals don't have that problem. "For nurses who practise telemedicine, the colleges regard the locus of practice to be where the nurse is located," says Dr Cradduck.

Even in provinces that have tried to regulate this issue, confusion persists. Ontario's new policy, established this July, allows some interprovincial telemedicine to take place. It requires its doctors to comply with the licensing requirements of the other province or territory they practice in, but Ontario claims to retain jurisdiction over their services and any complaints. "I think the issue is one that FMRAC needs to get into again," says Dr Carlisle. "It's the responsibility of regulators to give as much guidance to the profession as they can, in the public interest."

BILLING DISPUTES
Many doctors are also cautious because it's not clear in cases who will pay them for interprovincial telemedicine. "There's a general lack of policy regarding physician reimbursement," says Raymond Pong, PhD, the research director at the Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research at Laurentian University.

Almost all provinces have established remuneration policies for intraprovincial telemedicine but interprovincial remuneration hasn't received the same level of attention. Dr Pong outlined this problem in a Health Law Review article in 2000; since then, there hasn't been much progress, he says.

SOLVING LICENSURE
With Saskatchewan's efforts, regulations on licensure fees, stalled by disagreement for years, now appear to be moving forward. Instead of forcing doctors who practise telemedicine on Saskatchewan patients to apply and pay for a full licence to practise, the College of Physicians and Surgeons is considering a plan to introduce easily acquired, reduced-rate telemedicine licences, much like locum licences. That's the solution FMRAC's 1998 recommendations suggested all provinces adopt. But in most provinces, a full licence to practise is still required, though some exceptions exist.

"There have been situations where some provinces made special arrangements," says Dr Pong. "But that's governed in a case by case manner, which is not the best in the world. It would be better to have a policy across the country."

"It is an evolving thing," says Dr Carlisle of interprovincial telemedicine practice. "There are a lot of issues that have to be resolved. Unfortunately, it may take a couple of very large lawsuits for people to realize that this needs to be regulated appropriately."

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.