OCTOBER 15, 2007
VOLUME 4 NO. 17

PATIENTS & PRACTICE

Assisted suicide doesn't target vulnerable

Study disputes notion that certain groups will be disproportionately euthanized


Assisted suicide vulnerability scores

AIDS patients — In Oregon, AIDS patients represented 2% of PASs. AIDS patients were more likely to use assisted suicide than "a comparable group of non-AIDS patients who died of chronic respiratory disorders." On top of this, among 131 Dutch homosexual men diagnosed with AIDS between 1985 and 1992 and dying by 1995, 22% of deaths were by PAS or euthanasia. "We suspect that this is a phenomenon of the era prior to the development of effective AIDS therapies, which has changed since 1995," says Dr Battin.

Women — Data from Oregon and the Netherlands found that women were slightly less likely than men to die by PAS.

Elderly — In Oregon, PAS more common among people aged 18-64 than over-65s. Likewise, Dutch rates were higher for under-80s.

Poor — PAS rates were were more common among affluent Oregonians, the authors conclude. Rough Dutch measures, based on postal codes, suggest the poor use PAS as much as the rich.

Society's most vulnerable don't die disproportionately when physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is legal, according to a study in the October Journal of Medical Ethics.

The 'slippery slope' theory is widely accepted by opponents and supporters of PAS alike. The idea is that physicians, family and health insurers may be able to bully vulnerable patients to request PAS, even if they don't want it. "If it were to be the case, it would require some serious rethinking. But nobody's looked at the data," says study co-author and philosophy professor Margaret Battin, PhD, of the University of Utah. "There may be pressures on all people with terminal illnesses. The question is if there's more in certain people."

The study looked at data from Oregon, where PAS is legal, and from the Netherlands, where both PAS and euthanasia by physicians are legal. Oregon data consisted of annual reports on 292 PASs from the Department of Human Services issued since the Oregon Death with Dignity Act (ODDA) came into effect in 1997, as well as three surveys of physicians. Dutch data are from government-commissioned studies dating back to 1990, covering 2,400 PASs and euthanasias.

Of the 10 groups identified as vulnerable, PAS rates looked suspicious in only one: AIDS patients (see Assisted suicide vulnerability scores, above, for details).

FINDINGS OPPOSED
The study quickly drew fire from PAS opponents. Criticism was levelled at Dr Battin for not disclosing her organizational affiliations as conflicts of interest, including her role as advisor to the Death with Dignity National Center, a non-profit organization which defends the ODDA.

Dr Battin admits she probably should have disclosed her position, but insists she has nothing to hide. "Conflict of interest disclosures are usually for financial interests, and this was a grant-free project. There were five scrupulous authors, and people are aware of my work, too." She suggests that if no one performed studies in which they had interests, nothing would ever get done.

Further critiques point to soft data, suggesting that physician reports are vulnerable to creative editing by reporting doctors. "For many of the variables, like age, race and gender, it seems improbable that doctors lied," says Dr Battin.

Dr Battin defends her methods, noting that where the data set overlapped, findings were largely consistent between the Oregon and Dutch data.

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.