JUNE 30, 2007
VOLUME 4 NO. 12

POLICY & POLITICS

Provinces roll out watered-down revalidation

Most MDs will be unaffected by mandatory CPD. Licensing link-up nixed


Remember the calls for a tough national recertification program for physicians? The ones that insisted doctors must prove their medical mettle every five years? Those who failed would risk losing their licence. Editorials, commentaries and conference speeches raged over the idea, some for but most against. Canadian physicians, it was clear, didn't want their competence decided by a random exam devised by some faceless regulatory body. What would they know about how you practice medicine?

Well, a few years on the debate has cooled and it appears the sceptics have prevailed. Provincial Colleges have started rolling out their dreaded revalidation programs, and from the looks of things the majority of physicians have nothing to worry about.

Saskatchewan was the first to introduce a mandatory continuing professional development (CPD) program, on January 1 of this year. Quebec follows suit on July 1. Ontario will likely launch its program next year. All provinces' Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons are expected to do the same in the near future, but in almost all cases the changes to the way doctors keep up to date will be minor.

NATIONAL STANDARDS
A soon-to-be-released position paper from the Federation of Medical Regulatory Authorities of Canada (FMRAC), a coalition of the provincial Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons, and other stakeholder groups is largely responsible for the revalidation chatter circulating now. Designed in part to shore up public trust, the report will likely recommend that "all licensed physicians in Canada must participate in a revalidation process in which they demonstrate a commitment to improving performance," says FMRAC president Dr Douglas Blackman.

SEVERAL SOLITUDES
Saskatchewan's system simply requires doctors to participate in the existing CPD programs of either the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) or the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) and provide proof to the provincial College's registrar. Quebec's College has chosen a different tack. Quebec doctors can either do the CFPC or RCPSC programs, or they can instead use a program designed and administered by their own College itself. The College's program focuses on what it calls self-directed development. It will consist of five steps, explains Dr Harold Dion, the former president of the Quebec College of Family Physicians. "First you reflect on your practice, then identify the areas of medicine you feel you are weak in. Then you decide what you will do to improve your knowledge and fill it out on a form," he says. "Then you go about doing your CPD activities. You then do an audit afterwards to see what improvements have occurred, what impact you have seen, and you send that form in every year when you renew your license."

If a physician fails to complete CPD requirements (in any of the three pathways), they must undergo peer review, and if they fail that, they will be offered retraining workshops to get them up to provincial standards. If a physician doesn't meet those standards, he will not be able to renew his license.

Quebec's third pathway, which will be administered at no extra cost to physicians, could attract up to half of the province's doctors, estimates Dr Andr� Jacques, CPD director of the Quebec College and chair of the FMRAC committee on revalidation.

VARYING PROGRESS
While the rest of the provincial Colleges plan to introduce mandatory CPD programs in the near future as well, there's no real sense of urgency. "Other provinces may want to wait and see how Quebec and Saskatchewan are running their resources, to see how it works," says Dr Jacques.

It's expected that most provinces will follow Saskatchewan's lead and consider the CFPC or RCPSC programs sufficient, adds Dr Blackman, simply to save money. Peer review programs, like the extensive existing ones already in place in Alberta and Nova Scotia, are expected to remain in place or even expand, as is now happening with Quebec's 30-year-old peer review system.

CRITICAL ASSESSMENT
Since the dream (or nightmare, depending on your viewpoint) of national guidelines was never realized, revalidation requirements are destined to be uneven across the country. Kathryn Clarke, of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO), thinks CPD guidelines should be not only national and mandatory, but also should permit portability to ensure that doctors from one province will have a minimum amount of CPD to qualify to practise in another province.

The most serious criticism levelled at proponents of revalidation has been, and remains, that there is no scientific evidence that mandatory relicensure improves medical outcomes. "Revalidation cannot assess competence. Rather, it can just assess commitment to competence," says Dr Suzanne Strasberg, chair of the Ontario Medical Association's Committee on Physician Revalidation. The OMA was successful several years ago at convincing the CPSO to drop the direct link between revalidation and relicensure — now, physicians who do not complete revalidation requirements will still be able to pass peer review assessments. Dr Blackman confirms the FMRAC recommendations will not ask provinces to tie CPD to relicensure.

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.