JUNE 15, 2007
VOLUME 4 NO. 11
EDITORIAL

LETTERS

MAKE RATE MDs WORK FOR YOU
Regarding your article "Doc's RateMDs battle turns ugly" (May 15, Vol 4, No 9, p 14), doctors should realize RateMDs isn't going away. Let's embrace the idea. Rather than trying to sabotage the site by making fake posts, etc, why not look at RateMDs as an opportunity? It gives us access to a valuable resource — our patients' opinions. As physicians, our aim is to provide excellent service to our patients; they get to judge our success. It's rewarding to read glowing reviews about our practices. But when patients are unhappy, that's a golden opportunity to make changes so the next patient is more satisfied. Let's ask our patients for suggestions on how to change our practices, and challenge them to give specific improvement ideas. Save yourself the work of coming up with solutions.

None of this will do away with libellous comments, but it will separate the flaming ranters from those leaving credible, constructive posts. Beyond that, we'll have to trust our patients to make their own decisions.

I'm trying an experiment to see if this will work. Check out my listing on RateMDs (under Saskatchewan physicians). If you want to try the same thing, feel free to copy and/or modify my posting from April 17, 2007 to suit yourself.

Dr Kishore Visvanathan, Saskatoon, SK

Editors' note: Check out "Advance access scheduling made easy" on page 10 of this issue for another of Dr Visvanathan's experiments.

MYTHIC DIAPERS
I read your article "Gambling: governments' dangerous addiction" (May 15, 2007, Vol 4, No 9, p 26) with great interest. It's a fact that some patrons do wear adult diapers when playing video lottery terminals (VLTs) because they believe the machine will pay out to someone else if they leave to go to the washroom. Until these myths are quashed, some patrons who have problem gambling issues will continue to wear diapers, or even urinate in coin cups, to avoid leaving the machine for even a moment.

Phillip J Boucher, Consultant in Electronic
Gaming Machine Addiction, Sudbury, ON

NO SEX, PLEASE, WE'RE MDs
Here's what some of your colleagues had to say about our May 15 poll question "With the Canadian physician shortage dire as ever, should punishments be relaxed for doctors' sexual slip ups?" (see page 17 for full poll results and this issue's questions):

  • We should relax reprimands on minor issues. Sexual impropriety or dangerous actions should still be viewed severely.
  • Some of the rules about dating patients should be reviewed as it's hard to attract single young MDs to rural areas if every resident is off- limits as far as dating is concerned!
  • Read the Hippocratic oath — yearly, at least. "Why does man not choose the virtuous path?"— The Koran
  • If you have no self-control and discipline you have no business in medicine.
  • Are you nuts?

CLARIFICATION
In the article "The doc who would be cricketer" (May 30, Vol 4, No 10, page 35) about Dr Nat Shah's passion for cricket it's stated that Dr Shah is a surgeon in Cornwall, ON. He is in fact a general practitioner.

 

Doctor, tell us what you think! Write to us at EDITOR@NATIONALREVIEWOFMEDICINE.com or fax your letter to 514-397-0228

 

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T. (514) 995-4398