MARCH 30, 2007
VOLUME 4 NO. 6

PATIENTS & PRACTICE

Mannitol for brain injury studies bogus: UK expert

Commonly-used treatment lacks evidence base



Is mannitol safe for TBI?

A recent article in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) has cast doubt on whether a trio of studies supporting the use of high-dose mannitol in the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) ever actually took place.

Mannitol is an osmotic diuretic believed to lessen the risk of long-term brain damage after TBI by reducing intracranial pressure. Although widely used, the treatment has never been proven effective in randomized, placebo-controlled trials. "That alone should have made us a little bit cautious," says Dr Ian Roberts, coordinating editor of the Cochrane Injuries Group (CIG) and lead author of the BMJ study. "As it is, these three papers were the only evidence of a specific pharmacological treatment being effective for head injury, and now we believe the results to be fraudulent. It's extremely disappointing," he adds.

The studies in question, published between 2001 and 2004 in the peer-reviewed journals Neuroscience and the Journal of Neuroscience, claim that administering rapid, high doses of mannitol (an average of 1.4 g per kilogram body weight) greatly improved patient outcomes compared to conventional doses. They were allegedly conducted by neurosurgeon Dr Julio Cruz at the Federal University of Sïo Paulo — except the university denies having ever employed him and there are no hospital records to back up his claims.

PATIENTS AT RISK
Unfortunately, Dr Cruz is unable to defend himself or his findings — he committed suicide in 2005. His three co-authors claim to have had little or no involvement in his clinical investigations, beyond perhaps allowing the use of their names. Neither they nor the publishing journals have shown willingness to look into the matter. Yet these studies form the only basis of evidence for the use of high-dose mannitol in treating TBI, potentially putting patients' lives at risk.

According to Dr Laurent Vanier, president of the Association of Emergency Physicians of Quebec and an Er doctor at Charles-LeMoyne Hospital, in Longueuil, Qc. Mannitol is generally used in severe cases of TBI, and then only in low doses of 0.5g to 1g per kilogram of body weight.

But owing in part to the fact that mannitol is such an inexpensive and readily available substance — it's a sugar alcohol — Dr Roberts maintains it's used at just about every hospital in the world. "The fact that doctors use it doesn't mean it's safe," he insists. "The implications for patients are serious. They are being treated on the basis of potentially unreliable evidence," he wrote.

PASSING THE BUCK
Dr Roberts' involvement in this affair began in May 2006, when he got a call from Dr Jorge Mejia. Dr Mejia had become concerned about the CIG's inclusion of the Cruz studies in its influential review after some Brazilian colleagues told him they believed the late physician's claims were false.

Since no one had any hard evidence to back up their suspicions, Dr Roberts contacted the co-authors: Dr Kazuo Okuchi of Nara Medical University, Japan; Dr Giulio Minoja, the ICU director of a hospital in Varese, Italy; and Dr Enrico Facco at the University of Padua, Italy. None of them could confirm the studies' legitimacy, so they were removed from the Cochrane database in 2006, pending investigation.

Dr Roberts also contacted the publishing journals. At least one editor admitted to suspecting Dr Cruz had fabricated his data, but said his editorial board had decided to run the study anyway.

When pressed further, the co-authors insisted that high-dose mannitol does work and that Dr Cruz was an honest scientist. However they admit to not having any knowledge of the dozens of patients Dr Cruz supposedly treated. "I think they're spineless, really. They need to accept that they share authorship of the disputed studies, which means they have a responsibility to verify whether the findings are true or not," says Dr Roberts. "If the data are true, defend them, and if they're false, retract them — but they're doing neither. They seem to want to keep their heads down and hope it blows over. It's completely ridiculous," he adds, frustrated.

CALL FOR RESEARCH
Dr Roberts contends that there haven't been big enough randomized controlled trials comparing mannitol or other osmotic diuretics like hypertonic saline with placebo or other TBI treatments.

"If some or all of Cruz's data on high-dose mannitol are false, then doctors will be providing their critically ill patients with uncertain and possibly harmful treatment. In doing so, those doctors will also deny their patients other treatments that are based on reliable evidence," Dr Charles Young argued in an accompanying editorial.

Dr Vanier is just happy the contentious findings didn't make their way into any major clinical practice guidelines, "which would have made their removal from common use extremely difficult," he says. Hopefully, he adds, the experience will finally lead to new randomized controlled trials to determine whether there's any basis for the treatment.

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.