MARCH 15, 2007
VOLUME 4 NO. 5

EDITORIAL

Healing our harmful adverse event
reporting system


One of the toughest situations a physician can face is when the tools they're given to heal end up harming their patients. In this issue, we look at the case of a medication that did just that and ask the question: Is adverse event (AE) reporting in Canada good enough?

"Antibiotic causes liver toxicity, indication curbed" examines how despite warnings about telithromycin, a newish antibiotic indicated for respiratory infections, over 28 million prescriptions have been written internationally.

New health products are always risky, and physicians accept this. What they can't accept is unreasonable risk due to communication failure. The physicians our reporter spoke to say Health Canada isn't doing enough to warn them about AEs, and that they often hear about them from the FDA or their pharma rep first.

The 2005 launch of MedEffect (www.healthcanada.gc.ca/medeffect), an online AE reporting website, was a step in the right direction. But other countries have gone farther. The US recently introduced blameless reporting and French hospitals now have roving teams of dedicated pharmacists and physicians who prowl the halls on the lookout for AEs. It's time for Canada to get on board and fast-track patient safety measures so physicians can spend more time doing what they do best: healing.

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T. (514) 995-4398