Four
years ago a New Westminster, BC, family physician thought
he was doing the right thing by his new grandchild.
On the baby's first birthday, he opened a Registered
Education Savings Plan (RESP) for the child (for more
on RESPs, see "Retirement
vs your children's education"). To get the ball
rolling, he simply called the agent he'd been dealing
with for years, asked her to open an account and mailed
her a cheque for $4,000.
The idea was that he would add
to the fund each year on the child's birthday. Nice
plan but what with one thing and another, he
failed to make any further contributions. With the child
now in his fifth year and about to start school, the
doctor's mind again turned to the lad's education. He
called the broker and asked how the plan was doing.
She had to look it up, she told him, and would fax the
latest quarterly statement to him. When the sheet arrived
he had to sit down. His $4,000 investment four-and-a-half
years earlier was now worth $3,758.16. The young boy
was $241.84 further away from accumulating a college
fund than he had been in 2002. The mutual funds into
which the education money was put failed to perform,
plain and simple. The lesson is a valuable one that
they don't teach in most colleges: pay attention when
you put your savings into mutual funds.
POPULAR
PITFALLS
Mutual funds are by far the most popular place for doctors
to put their RRSP investments. Fully 78% of NRM
readers have more than half of their sheltered money
in mutual funds according to the latest Personal Finance
Survey, and a notable 41% have all their investments
in the funds.
One of the reasons for this is
the popularity of the well-managed funds offered exclusively
to physicians and their families through MD Management
Ltd's MD Funds Management Inc, part of the Canadian
Medical Association group of companies.
Investors in these or any other
mutual fund receive quarterly reports. But too many
of your colleagues don't even bother to open these documents
when they arrive.
There are a few reasons for this.
If you're 20 years from retirement, is it really necessary
to track every tick up and down? Even if you did keep
yourself au courant, what could you do about it? Finding
out why a fund is rising or falling is picky, often
frustrating work.
There are doubtless more important
things in your life but it does make sense to review
your holdings at least once a year.
What you discover is often unpleasant,
as the West Coast FP found out. The fact is there are
hundreds of mutual funds for Canadians to choose from
and they're far from created equal. Leaving aside the
matter of management fees, front and rear loads, penalties
for cashing out early and a host of other wrinkles in
the fine print, there's the matter of performance. It's
sobering to know, for example, that international funds
on average gained only 2.4% a year since 2001. You could
have done almost as well with a savings account at the
bank down the street.
WHAT'S
THE MINIMUM?
That's not to say, of course, that some funds didn't
do very well indeed. One called United-International
Equity Value Portfolio managed by United Financial Group
racked up a wealth-creating 10.4% a year in each of
the last five years. The fifth top international equity
performer, Acadian Core International Equity Fund, pulled
off an average annual return of 8.8%. There is, however,
a drawback for those wishing to invest in these funds:
a minimum investment is required.
Most physicians could likely meet
the ante to get in on the United-International's gravy
train, possibly by transferring funds from other investments
the minimum is $25,000. Acadian Core, on the
other hand, blatantly caters to the richest of the rich.
The entrance fee: $5 million.
You may be under the impression
that funds with high minimum investment criterion are
few and far between and are confined to the top performers.
You'd be right and you'd be wrong. Fully a quarter
of the funds on the Canadian market have minimums. That
doesn't guarantee performance, but it does seem to help.
Three of the top five performing Canadian equity funds
require hefty minimum investments, as do four of the
top five US performers. In the more esoteric "alternative
strategies" club, all five of the top funds require
you to begin with $10,000 or more.
You could be forgiven if you believe
that this only confirms that the more money you have,
the more money you make. There are, however, happy exceptions.
You can get into The CIBC International Small Company
Fund by plunking down a paltry $500 and it's returned
an average of 9.4% in each of the last five years.
So the next time you receive your
statement, give it a read. Likely you're making more
than 2.5% and less than 10% a year. If your return is
closer to the two than the 10, consider switching to
one of the better performers it might even be
worth coming up with the minimum ante.
|