|
FMRAC's golden
rules of revalidation
1. Inclusiveness. All
physicians must participate in a process of revalidation
within their regulatory jurisdiction.
2. Fairness. The process
will be transparent and will use fair and standardized
tools.
3. Relevance. Revalidation
is designed to enhance physicians' performance
in their practice and ensure they're practising
in accordance with current standards.
4. Accountability. The
process is linked with licensure.
5. Portability. Revalidation
won't form an additional barrier to interprovincial
or territorial portability.
|
Brace yourself. No matter what
province you practise in, it looks like you're going
to have to revalidate your licence sooner or later.
"Although it's difficult to predict, I think that we'll
see some implementation of a national revalidation strategy
within the next one to two years," says Dr Craig Campbell,
the director of professional development at the Royal
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC).
The Federation of Medical Regulatory
Authorities of Canada (FMRAC) has put together a working
group, which includes the provincial licensing colleges,
the RCPSC and the College of Family Physicians of Canada
(CFPC). The goal of this collaboration is to establish
national standards for revalidation. "Each provincial
licensing body has the right to determine what they
will require," says Fleur-Ange Lefebvre, PhD, the executive
director of the FMRAC. "All we're asking is that the
provinces adhere to the five principles (see box "FMRAC's
golden rules"). It will ultimately be up to the provinces
to manage the revalidation process."
"Revalidation is an issue that
concerns the [provincial] licensing colleges," explains
Dr Bernard Marlow, the director of continuing professional
development at the CFPC. The input and participation
of the CFPC and the RCPSC is crucial. Both educational
colleges have well-developed and well-established continuing
professional development (CPD) programs that monitor
credits. The plan is to make their systems available
to all doctors, including non-members, in a push to
make accredited CPD the standard in this country.
THE
TRAILBLAZER
On March 31 the Quebec College of Physicians adopted
new rules to regulate CPD. Professional development
was already mandatory for Quebec MDs but with the new
ruling the method changes slightly. "Physicians now
have to reflect more on their CPD activities," says
Dr Andre Jacques, the director of professional practice
enhancement at the provincial college. "They have to
ask the questions, 'how will this enhance my practice?'
and 'how will this help me take better care of my patients?'."
He explains that the college is
currently working on tools to help facilitate the process.
He believes that the program will be up and running
by July 2007. In the meantime, he adds, he has to work
to sell physicians on the idea.
CPD
OR ELSE...
Saskatchewan is another province pushing for mandatory
continuing professional development for the purpose
of revalidation. "Physicians will be required to meet
either the CPD requirements of the CFPC or alternatively
the requirements of the RCPSC," says Bryan Salte, the
associate registrar of the College of Physicians and
Surgeons of Saskatchewan (CPSS). "We basically said,
if you want to practise and maintain your licence, you'll
have to enrol in one of those programs."
The CPSS has presented the plan
to the province's physicians. Mr Salte says that more
doctors have started to enrol in the CPD programs offered
by either certifying college. He believes that an official
process for revalidation should be in place by January
2007.
PEER-TO-PEER
Mandatory CPD isn't the only way to ensure a physician's
professional standards are up to snuff. Peer-assessment
is another method some provinces are using to keep doctors
in the loop. Alberta was one of the first to do this
through their Peer-Assessment Review (PAR) program.
"In a nutshell, all physicians receive feedback about
their performance from colleagues, co-workers and patients,
wherever possible, once every five years," explains
Bryan Ward, deputy registrar of the College of Physicians
and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA). About 10% of docs are
interviewed and a bit less than 5% of them get reviewed
by their peers. Some fear peer review isn't enough,
and that's why, says Mr Ward, Alberta is looking into
adding a CPD component to the PAR.
Nova Scotia has a plan similar
to the Alberta model. It was introduced in 2005, and
currently looks at FPs. In the fall it will expand to
other specialties, according to Bruce Thorne, the Nova
Scotia College's communications manager.
The College of Physicians and Surgeons
of Ontario (CPSO) has just finished a lengthy consultation
about revalidation. They will integrate aspects of peer-assessment
and CPD into their three-component plan. "The direction
of component one will be done through the educational
colleges," explains Dr Rocco Gerace, the registrar at
the CPSO. As with the other provinces, there will be
some sort of mandatory CME or CPD. The province isn't
yet ready to start revalidating docs though. "We are
aiming for a time frame around 2010," estimates Dr Gerace.
"Right now we have to look at how to implement this."
THE
EXAMINED LIFE
Ontario, like many other provinces, is waiting to see
what comes out of a series of meetings to be held by
the FMRAC working group before moving ahead with more
comprehensive revalidation programs. The meetings begin
this month and run through the summer. Dr Jacques heads
this working group. He says that the Quebec plan will
serve as a model and that FMRAC will work closely with
the national colleges to integrate more self-reflection
into their current CPD.
The key aspect remains this cycle
of self-reflection. "Revalidation will be practice relevant
and individualized," stresses Ms Lefebvre. "It will
be educational. Not punitive."
|