MAY 15, 2006
VOLUME 3 NO. 9

PATIENTS & PRACTICE

Rushed BP tests skew diagnoses

Patients perched on exam tables have inflated readings: study


A blood pressure reading is one of those indicators that can determine a whole course of treatment. It's also perhaps the simplest and commonest test performed in a physician's office. So you'd think medical science would have the humble sphygmomanometer pretty much figured out.

But the most common method of taking blood pressure is likely to give consistently high readings, according to a study by a group of nurses from the University of Virginia Health System.

Their findings suggest that many patients may be getting systolic blood pressure readings as much as 14 points higher than they should be when the test is conducted with the patient sitting in the wrong position. The research was presented at the national conference of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association in Denver in late April.

The American Heart Association recommends that patients be tested sitting in a chair, with both feet on the floor, and that they are allowed to sit quietly for five minutes before testing. But the commonest method, say the nurses, is to test people sitting on the examination table, with their feet dangling, and no back support. And hardly anyone waits five minutes.

"It's a physiological response," says Melynda Zarzyski, the study project co-ordinator and a nurse at University of Virginia Health System. "If you're sitting on a chair, with your back and feet supported, you're not doing as much work as you are supporting yourself on the exam table. Also, for a lot of elderly people, just climbing up onto the exam table requires some physical exertion."

TAKE IT HIGHER
One hundred patients were tested, having been randomized to either chair-first or table-first examinations. Each patient was then tested in the other position, and the readings compared. "They served as their own controls," says Ms Zarzyski.

The exam table readings came in 14 points higher than those taken in chairs, a very substantial difference that could lead to a lot of extra diagnoses of hypertension.

In all cases, the patients rested calmly for at least five minutes before each reading. So even the exam table readings were taken under better conditions than many real-world blood pressure tests.

All patients were also tested on both arms, with the arms held at heart level. "This is the part of the guidelines that people most often forget," says Ms Zarzyski. "The elbows should be at heart level, but you rarely see it done."

The researchers also sought to study the "white coat effect," often claimed to raise patients' blood pressure, but they found it had no significant influence on readings. However, the authors note that many of the patients knew the technicians taking the readings, which could have attenuated that effect.

The nurses can't prove, of course, that most people are failing to follow the correct procedure, but they're pretty sure. "We're just basing it on experience. And even some of the patients told us: 'My other doctor always does it sitting on the exam table.'"

"It's easier to do when the patient is higher up on the exam table," she adds. "And yet the guidelines clearly state that the chair is the proper way. That's why we did this study. It's one of those things where what is recommended is very different to what you see in practice. This gave us a good reason to change our practice."

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.