APRIL 30, 2006
VOLUME 3 NO. 8

PATIENTS & PRACTICE

Bacteria blamed for asthma flare-ups

Study finds ketolides aid recovery


Taking a new class of antibiotic after an asthma attack can relieve symptoms, according to new research that suggests atypical bacteria may play a role in the disease's exacerbations.

A study in the April 13 edition of the New England Journal of Medicine reports that patients who took the antibiotic telithromycin reported fewer symptoms following an asthma attack than those who took placebo. Telithromycin belongs to a new class of antibiotics, ketolides, which can reduce inflammation and act against atypical bacteria like Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

Professor Sebastian Johnston from Imperial College London, who led the research, said: "Traditionally antibiotics have not proven effective in treating asthma attacks, but this development could open up a whole new area of research in the treatment of asthma."

A total of 278 adults aged 18-55 from more than 70 centres around the world took part in the trial. All of the subjects were enrolled within 24 hours of an acute exacerbation that required medical care.

Half were randomized to receive the antibiotic telithromycin at 800mg daily for 10 days. The rest were given a placebo. The trial was double-blinded, and patients continued to take their normal asthma medications such as albuterol or levalbuterol hydrochloride.

BREATHING EASIER
The improvements seen in symptoms were significant, if not very dramatic. On a seven-point symptom scale, the treatment group saw an average improvement of 1.3 points, compared to 0.8 points in the placebo group. Time to recovery averaged five days in the treated patients, and eight in the others.

There was no difference in the other primary outcome, morning peak expiratory flow. But over the first 14 days, treatment group patients experienced nearly double the improvement from baseline in terms of forced expiratory volume. This treatment advantage then subsided, leaving the two groups equal after 42 days.

GIV'R TO THE LIVER?
The most common side effects seen in the telithromycin group were diarrhea, nausea and upper abdominal pain, affecting 10%, 5% and 3% of patients respectively. Only nausea was significantly more common in the treatment group than in the placebo group.

A report in the March 21 issue Annals of Internal Medicine described three cases of severe liver toxicity seen in patients taking telithromycin, but no such cases emerged in this small trial.

Most antibiotics used for respiratory tract infections have been associated with hepatotoxicity at one point or another. While the FDA is keeping an eye on telithromycin, there seems no reason to believe it is more dangerous than others. Some 22 million courses of treatment with the drug have been prescribed for sinusitis, acute bronchitis and pneumonia since 2001. A study comparing it to amoxicillin-clavulanate in over 24,000 patients found no significant difference between the two treatments in liver toxicity.

Patients with overt respiratory infections were excluded from the trial, but that doesn't mean infection isn't involved in their symptoms. It's already widely accepted that viral infection is often the cause of asthma exacerbations.

The trial's basic hypothesis was that Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae are also implicated in asthma symptoms, thus the trial's name: TELICAST, short for telithromycin, chlamydophila and asthma.

CURIOUS FINDINGS
When tested for these two bacteria, 61% of the study's participants were serologically positive. Yet oddly, there was no correlation between the patients' measured bacteriologic status and their response to the antibiotic.

This leaves open the question of whether the drug is working through another mechanism, since the ketolide antibiotics also have immunomodulatory qualities -- that is, they have the capacity to modify immune functions -- and they can reduce inflammation.

"Although we're not sure about the exact mechanism which caused this antibiotic to be effective, this study indicates it does clearly have a beneficial effect," said Professor Johnston. "We still need further trials to confirm these results, to investigate the mechanisms of action of this treatment, to see if the same benefits are seen with other related antibiotics and to see which patients are most likely to benefit."

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.