APRIL 15, 2006
VOLUME 3 NO. 7

PATIENTS & PRACTICE

In depth: prescribing practices

Know when it's time to nix an Rx

Polypharmacy, adverse events put elderly patients at risk


Newer, better, safer drugs are the holy grail of medical research, and before they hit the market, lots of work is put into figuring out exactly how they should be used and who should take them. But almost no one ever asks when it's time to stop a medication. Now, a group of University of Chicago geriatricians has shed some light on when to call it quits with a new framework for taking elderly patients off their meds.

As the years pile on, so do the prescriptions, until seniors are taking a fearsome cocktail of drugs that have often never been adequately tested in their age group. The risk of adverse events and dangerous drug interactions, "can grow to the point where the burden greatly outweighs the benefit," says lead author Dr Holly Holmes (see "Improper prescribing puts seniors in peril", NRM February 15, 2006, Vol 3, No 3, Page 8). So she and her team have proposed a way to help you decide when it's time to toss one. Their model includes four components: the patient's remaining life expectancy, the expected time until benefit of the drug in question, the patient's goals of care and the treatment target that a physician might consider attainable with the drug. The study was published in the Archives of Internal Medicine on March 26.

LOOK TO THE NEAR FUTURE
The researchers present their model as a pyramid, where the wide base represents all the drugs that might be considered appropriate for a 65-year-old patient, and the four walls are the four components of the decision process. As options narrow over time, so the pyramid narrows towards the top, and an ever-diminishing list of drugs remains appropriate.

"In this model, the drugs most likely to fall by the wayside over time are those with a long-term preventive effect, such as statins," says co-author Dr Deon Cox-Hayley, Medical Director of Windermere Senior Health Center in Chicago. Those most likely to remain on the list are short acting drugs for symptom control.

You'd expect patients to panic when they realize your focus is shifting to palliative care, but Dr Cox-Hayley says just the opposite is true — many actually find it quite liberating. While the young old still expect therapies aimed at prevention, or if necessary, cure, the authors found the very old come to expect symptomatic control. "Most of our patients know, frankly, that the end is near, and they've learned to accept that," she says. "There's less resistance than you might think." In fact, many jump at the chance to drop some of their medications, at least in part because it will save them a lot of money.

Whether the same enthusiasm would exist in Canada, where many seniors don't pay drug costs out of pocket, is a debatable point. "We may find out soon enough, with the introduction of the new prescription drug plan [in the US]. The cost argument may not be on our side anymore in the future," says Dr Holmes. But she's quick to point out that there are plenty of good reasons besides money. "It's well established for many drugs that adverse events grow more serious and common in older patients."

TRIALS AND ERRORS
Dr Holmes says the increased risk of adverse events in the elderly is compounded by the fact that most drugs are hardly tested in this population. And often, the trials that do include seniors don't last long enough to get a good sense of time to benefit. "This makes it harder to measure the trade-off between benefit and burden, so we can't possibly devise a chart or table that will reliably tell us when to drop medications," she says. "It has to be case-by-case, and a question of clinical judgement."

The question of getting older patients into clinical trials is often raised, but most studies eliminate candidates with comorbid conditions. Some older patients are excluded because of other treatments they're receiving, or because their primary chronic condition is too advanced. Often, to avoid hassle, researchers just set a maximum age.

Only one study has set out to measure adverse events from discontinuing medications in elderly patients. It too, was published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, back in 1997 and revealed very few problems. The Chicago group are now planning their own prospective study, focusing on patients with moderate dementia.

In the meantime, Dr Holmes advises asking elderly patients what they think of their drug regimen before suggesting withdrawal of medicines. "I rarely sit a patient down and say 'let's stop controlling your hypertension'. Instead of telling a patient straight out, I find it helps to elicit their opinion first."

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.