APRIL 15, 2006
VOLUME 3 NO. 7

PATIENTS & PRACTICE

Sluggish care blights stroke outcomes

Patients not getting meds fast enough. Clinic dearth,
insufficient training blamed


A majority of the 50,000 Canadians who suffer a stroke each year aren't getting the rapid-fire clot busting treatment that's their best chance of recovery.

"Ten years ago, about all we could do for a stroke patient was hold their hand," says Dr Antoine Hakim, CEO and scientific director of the Canadian Stroke Network. But despite advances in acute treatment and recovery in the last decade, there are still only a handful of specialized stroke units in Canada and these are the places with the best track record for stroke survival and recovery. The units, which vary from acute interventional to integrated units where patients are followed through their rehabilitation, dramatically improve patient outcomes mainly because they do offer rapid administration of thrombolytic therapy.

What's more, new research published in the March issue of Stroke has suggested insufficient stroke training is leading to sluggish diagnoses and limits access to care. "The doctor often lacks experience and confidence," says study author Dr Peter Hand, a neurologist at Royal Melbourne Hospital in Australia. Canadian stroke specialists agree there simply aren't enough qualified specialists to go around.

TIME IS BRAIN
The thrombolytic drug tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has drastically improved outcomes for patients who've suffered an ischemic stroke, where a clot occludes a blood vessel that feeds the brain. But time is of the essence. "After a stroke, brain tissue progressively dies over time. The greater delay to treatment, the less likely it is to be successful," explains Dr Hand.

Trouble is, tPA has an extremely narrow window: ideally, it should be administered within three hours of symptom onset. The rub is that tPA should only be given after a CT scan has ruled out hemorrhagic stroke, where thrombolytic drugs would only make things worse. Dr Frank Silver, director of the University Health Network's stroke program in Toronto, says this is the biggest problem with tPA — figuring out who's appropriate for the treatment. "If you give it to the wrong person, it's disastrous," he explains, because it can cause increased bleeding. But when it's used right, tPA can greatly reduce the risk of permanent disability.

A FEW GOOD EXPERTS
As is the case with many other specialities in Canada, the sad reality is provincial funding cuts have meant a decline in people with the expertise to treat stroke (see "Specialists' thinning ranks", Vol 3, No 5). In 2005, only 27 neurology residency positions were offered in Canadian medical schools. "Clearly, we have to increase the training of all physicians, because the average patient isn't going to be under the care of a stroke neurologist," says Dr Silver.

Dr Hakim says it doesn't really matter what kind of physician sees the patient. "What's important is that they've received sufficient training." All the neurology and neurosurgery training programs, as well as internal, family and emergency medicine, include training in stroke care, according to Dr Nick Busing, president of the Association of Medical Schools of Canada. But each university dictates the amount of time young doctors actually spend on dedicated stroke instruction. And whatever that adds up to, experts say it just isn't enough. "The average cardiologist or internist can deal with a GI problem, but if it's a neurological case, they all back off," says Dr Silver. "Med students receive more training in how to set a broken bone than in how to manage a stroke patient," adds Dr Hakim.

All of this is borne out by Dr Hand's study. "The neurological assessment can be daunting for a non-neurologist," he says. "We were surprised to find that two clinicians often couldn't even agree on the day of symptom onset," he says. Given the tiny window for administering tPA, his data is alarming.

THE MISSING LINK
That's where the stroke unit comes in. A specialized stroke centre should have, at minimum, a dedicated emergency medical team available 24/7 with appropriate expertise in tPA therapy and diagnostic assessment capabilities which includes rapid access to a CT scan. Many also include a prevention clinic and rehabilitation care. "The organizational stuff is simply related to the fact that you have a great need for speed," says Dr Michael D Hill, director of the stroke unit at Foothills Hospital in Calgary. "If you don't recognize that, you'll never achieve good outcomes in stroke patients."

Dedicated stroke units lead to a 14% reduced risk of death at one-year followup and a 22% reduced risk of death and dependency compared to traditional services, according to a systematic review by the Cochrane Consensus published in January. "Patients who receive organized stroke unit care are more likely to survive their stroke, return home and make a good recovery," concluded the authors. Yet according to data from the Canadian Stroke Network's Registry, only 18% of stroke patients were admitted to a specialized stroke unit in 2001 and 2002, and only 31% received organized stroke care in hospital.

So why are there still so few of these units in Canada? "Change takes time," says Dr Silver, "and it's kind of foreign to the average physician to be a part of a multidisciplinary team." Dr Hill finds the limited number of specialized centres a bit of a mystery. "It's most likely a lack of knowledge at the executive level and a lack of a champion at a local centre," he speculates.

A PLAN OF ACTION
Because of the huge regional differences in stroke survival rates across the country, the Canadian Stroke Network and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada partnered up to create the Canadian Stroke Strategy (CSS) in June 2004. The CSS aims to help each province set up a game plan to close the gap and improve patient care by 2010.

The comprehensive, national stroke strategy is based on a similar program launched in Ontario in 2000. "There's a person in each province doing scans to see where they're at and to help policymakers see that having a stroke program makes sense because it provides more cost-effective care," explains Dr Silver. Ontario's groundbreaking strategy sure got the message across: the provincial government is now allocating $30 million a year to the Ontario Stroke System. Alberta and Nova Scotia aren't far behind, and BC is coming along as well.

Dr Silver points out that Canada is actually way ahead of many jurisdictions in the world, especially the US. "In part it's advocacy, setting up systems and providing resources," says Dr Hill. "Changing an existing system is difficult."

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.