Rosuvastatin therapy doesn't just stop arterial plaque
formation, it actually sends atherosclerosis into full
retreat, according to a groundbreaking trial that raises
the bar for treatment of high-risk cardiac patients. But
it does so by using statin dosages far higher than those
normally recommended by Health Canada.
The ASTEROID trial tested 40mg
of rosuvastatin daily on 507 subjects at 53 centres
in Canada, the US, Europe and Australia. This extremely
aggressive statin therapy reduced low-density (LDL)
or 'bad' cholesterol by, on average, slightly more than
half. High-density (HDL) or 'good' cholesterol levels
were raised by a mean average 14.7%, an unprecedented
boost in a figure that's seen as practically impossible
to budge.
The effects on atherosclerotic
plaques were not as dramatic, but still highly significant.
Lead author Dr Steven Nissen, of the University of Michigan
Medical School, says he'd never seen regression of atherosclerotic
plaques in his entire career before this trial. The
findings appear in the March 13 issue of JAMA
and are freely available online.
The ASTEROID (A Study to Evaluate
the Effect of Rosuvastatin on Intravascular Ultrasound-Derived
Coronary Atheroma Burden) trial lasted two years. Changes
in atherosclerotic burden over time were measured with
the relatively new technique of intravascular ultrasound
that relies on a catheter to visualize the inner wall
of blood vessels. Dr Nissen and his team found that
total atheroma volume was reduced by an average of 6.8%,
while atheroma volume in the most diseased 10mm subsegment
fell by a mean average of 8.5%.
Of 507 patients who began the trial,
349 progressed to the end and had usable intravascular
ultrasound rates. Their average age was 58, 70% were
male and almost all were white. Most were taking concomitant
medications including aspirin, beta-blockers and ACE
inhibitors.
Dr Nissen said the high dropout
rate wasn't due to poor tolerance of the high-dose statins.
"Many subjects decided that they didn't feel like undergoing
a second catheterization [at the end of the trial] for
research purposes. We had to respect that decision,"
he explains.
The key finding of this study,
said Dr Nissen, is that the regression of atheroma was
only seen after patients' LDL cholesterol was pushed
down farther than current guidelines recommend. "I recently
did a study where we got cholesterol down to an average
of two mmol/L (78 mg/dL), and we didn't see anything
like this. Here we were getting cholesterol down to
about 1.6 mmol/L (62 mg/dL). That's very aggressive
treatment, but it seems to make a major difference."
WORTH
1,000 WORDS
The findings have caused widespread excitement among
heart disease experts.
After studying an intravascular
ultrasound image of a before-and-after atherosclerotic
plaque from the study, Dr Jacques Genest, director of
the cardiology division at the McGill University Health
Centre, exclaims: "Wow, they really reduced the size.
That's impressive."
Dr Sidney Blumenthal, a cardiologist
from Johns Hopkins, points out in a JAMA commentary
that the same photo showed that the lumen of the blood
vessel the actual cavity or channel was
actually no larger than before treatment. As the plaques
disappear, instead of the hollow inside of the vessel
growing wider, he suggested the elastic outer membrane
may contract, leaving the lumen itself unchanged.
But he says the results were significant
nonetheless. "While the lumen in a resting person might
be the same diameter, lowering cholesterol this much
will have a beneficial effect on the epithelium, improving
its ability to dilate during stress or exercise." The
structure of the plaque also becomes safer, he added."Lumen
is not the critical issue in cardiac events," adds Dr
Genest. "Breakdown of the atherosclerotic plaque is
generally the trigger. Lowering LDL cholesterol not
only reduces plaque size, it also stabilizes the plaque
cap, reducing the chance of rupture."
So where do these disappearing
plaque fibrins actually go? "They're removed to the
liver by HDL cholesterol through the reverse cholesterol
transport pathway, then excreted," explains Dr Nissen.
RISKS
vs BENEFITS
The most feared side effect of statins is rhabdomyolysis
the breakdown of skeletal muscle that can lead
to acute renal failure but Dr Nissen saw no incidents
in the ASTEROID trial. Concerns over rhabdomyolysis
led Health Canada to recommend a low starting dose for
patients taking rosuvastatin. Some at-risk groups, notably
Asians and people with kidney problems, are advised
to start at just 5mg.
Forty milligrams is the highest
approved dose, but Health Canada says this dose should
be avoided in people taking other lipid-lowering drugs,
heavy drinkers, those with hypothyroidism or liver problems
and Asians, in whom genetic differences cause the same
dose to typically produce twice the serum levels.
Dr Nissen, however, says that his
experience leads him to believe that a reassessment
of the risks and benefits is in order. Dr Genest, who's
participating in an FDA safety-monitoring program involving
50,000 statin users, agrees that the risk of rhabdomyolysis
is remote. "At 40mg, rosuvastatin, like atorvastatin
and simvastatin, does cause a few cases of myalgia [muscle
pain], about one %. But rhabdomyolysis is exceedingly
rare, occurring at a fairly constant rate of one per
two million."
Dr Genest concludes that as a proof
of concept, this study is a great success. But, he warns,
cardiologists are always wary of studies with surrogate
endpoints. "We want to see large, randomized studies
with endpoints like mortality and cardiac events."
|