FEBRUARY 15, 2006
VOLUME 3 NO. 3

ADVANCES in MEDICINE

New ultrasound device busts clots better

Technique accelerates delivery of clot-dissolving
drugs, minimizes bleeding


Who could say no to a treatment that yields better results, with fewer complications, at lower cost? That's precisely the claim being made for a new clot-busting device that has outperformed the gold standard, according to data presented at the International Symposium on Endovascular Therapy (ISET) conference held in Miami Beach on January 16-20.

Typically, acute clots in the extremities are dealt with by infusing clot-dissolving drugs. The process takes many hours, all the while leaving the patient exposed to a high risk of bleeding. But this new device can dramatically speed the process, enough to spare many patients even a single night's hospital stay.

"Using this device we may be able to begin doing infusions [of the lytic drug] without the patient having to stay overnight," says Dr Thomas McNamara, chief of vascular and interventional radiology at UCLA Medical Center in Westwood, CA, who presented his group's findings at the meeting. "When you don't have overnight infusion, you almost never have bleeding."

THE SOUND OF SUCCESS
The device in question is an ultrasound catheter. Like existing catheters used in clot lysis, it has channels for drug delivery, but it boasts one added feature — a central wire bearing up to five groups of six tiny ultrasound transducers. The ultrasound loosens the tangle of fibrins that make up a clot, allowing the drugs to penetrate faster and interact with a broader surface area. At the same time, the ultrasound propels the drug into the clot as though it were under pressure. The result is a faster and more thorough lysis.

Ultrasound is already used to break up kidney stones and even to attack some tumours. But the role of ultrasound in the dissolution of blood clots isn't to break them up. In fact, avoiding "fragmentation emboli," a more refined term for what's left over when a clot is smashed to bits, is a vital prerequisite for treating peripheral blood clots because those loose fragments can make their way to the lungs, leading to a potentially fatal case of pulmonary embolism if undetected. Dr McNamara stresses that the ultrasound's purpose is purely to facilitate drug delivery, not to break the clot up. And unlike high-power applications such as are seen in cancer therapy, this level of ultrasound neither raises temperature nor damages tissue. Even the loosening effect on the clot itself is transient.

Under the microscope, the fibrins in a clot look like a loose ball of yarn. Photos shown to the ISET conference by Dr Keith Sterling, a specialist in vascular radiology at Inova Alexandria Hospital in Virginia, showed a notable loosening of these fibres after ultrasound.

PROOF IN NUMBERS
Two trials of the device were presented at ISET. Dr McNamara's study involved 66 patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease, which, as the name suggests, can result from clot formation in a peripheral artery. The clots were completely dissolved in 58 of these patients and only one suffered non-fatal major bleeding. This success rate of 88% compares to a rate of 66% achieved in a comparable study of the current gold standard. And the bleeding rate of 1.3% represents a large improvement on the 12.5% rate seen with conventional treatment, says Dr McNamara. "It's a big step forward."

That 92% reduction in bleeding complications is largely due to reduced time of infusion, says Dr McNamara. The 88% lysis rate was achieved after 17.5 hours, compared to 24.4 hours with the less effective, conventional treatment.

The time savings were even more dramatic among the 33 patients treated by Dr Sterling for deep venous thrombosis (DVT), the formation of a clot in a deep vein, usually in the leg or pelvis. The new technique dissolved 70% of clots after 23.3 hours. In comparison, two large studies of existing treatments for DVT found that 31% of clots were completely dissolved after 37 hours it took 53 hours to get that number up to 38%. Once again, bleeding was significantly reduced with the ultrasound-enhanced device, from 11.4% in the gold standard studies to only 5% of patients in this trial.

SAVING TIME AND MONEY
Current data suggests that about one in 20 people in industrialized countries can expect DVT at some point in their life. Almost 60,000 Canadians are hospitalized each year and associated mortality is high, about 21% over one year among over-60s, mostly due to pulmonary embolism. (For more on PE diagnosis, see "Closing the net on deadly clots")

Each hospitalized case costs more than $2,500, according to a 2003 survey of Canadian DVT statistics published in the New England Journal of Medicine. This adds up to a total annual cost in the $100 million range.

The ultrasound catheter has no price tag yet, but it's unlikely to be outrageous, since it merely combines two existing technologies. But the savings in bed time and reduced complications not to mention the lower risk of pulmonary embolisms implied by these findings could be significant if further study bears out the technique's early promise.

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.