JULY 30, 2005
VOLUME 2 NO. 13
 

Chemo and surgery combo improves
lung cancer survival

New drugs and better control of side effects are key


Giving patients a lung cancer diagnosis is never easy. The treatment options that are available can be arduous and don't guarantee that the cancer won't recur elsewhere in the body. But new research is offering hope and time to those suffering from the disease by way of improved treatments.

Results of a trial published in the June 23 New England Journal of Medicine, which involved 482 patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Canada and the US, show that those treated with surgery and chemotherapy lived on average 21 months longer than those who had only surgery. Chemo and surgery prolonged recurrence-free survival.

"This is the best news for lung cancer patients in decades," says Dr Timothy Winton, lead author and an associate professor and director of the Division of Thoracic Surgery at the University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton. "GPs out there need to realize that the benefits of this treatment are and will continue shifting the standard of practice around the world."

Broken down, results demonstrated that 69% of patients who had surgery followed by chemotherapy were still alive five years later, compared with 54% who had only surgery, an increase of 15%.

IMPROVED TREATMENTS
These encouraging results could be due in part to improvements in chemotherapy drugs and the management of side effects; two reasons that prompted the study authors to re-examine the use of chemo for this specific type of lung cancer. New agents like vinorelbine, gemcitabine, taxanes and camptothecins when paired with a platinum derivative, increase the response of treatment. And serotonin-receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce the severity of vomiting in those using cisplatin. In this current study, patients were given a combination of two drugs, cisplatin and vinorelbine, once a week for 16 weeks.

"The benefits demonstrated in this study far exceed that seen in breast or colon cancer when adjuvant therapy was adopted [in treating] these diseases," explains Dr Winton. "Furthermore this was achieved with a short four month treatment regimen that was well tolerated and from which patients recovered rapidly — this is not a particularly toxic therapy and it works extremely well and is inexpensive to boot."

Traditionally, surgery without chemotherapy was the recommended treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. But the cancer often recurred, usually elsewhere in the body, and was typically incurable.

NEJM Jun 23, 2005;352:2589-97

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.