The link between poor glycemic control and poor heart
health is one of the best documented in medicine, yet
also one of the least understood. We do know, however,
that poor glycemic control isn't limited to people with
diabetes. Metabolic syndrome, also known as insulin resistance
syndrome, is basically a pre-diabetic condition defined
by a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors.
MI
AT RISK
A patient is considered to have metabolic syndrome or
syndrome X if he or she surpasses the set thresholds
in three out of five characteristics: waist circumference;
blood pressure; and concentrations of triglycerides,
high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and fasting
plasma glucose. What does it all mean in terms of cardiac
outcomes? Rather a lot, according to French research
published in the May 23 edition of the Archives of
Internal Medicine. The study looked not at heart
attack rates, but at heart failure in hospitalized patients
who had already suffered acute myocardial infarction
(AMI). "In-hospital case fatality was higher in patients
with metabolic syndrome compared with those without,
as was the incidence of severe heart failure," claim
the authors in their study.
The research team, led by Dr Yves
Cottin from the University of Burgundy in Dijon, France
followed 633 consecutive patients hospitalized after
heart attack, and categorized them according to metabolic
criteria. Two hundred and ninety, or 46%, met the National
Cholesterol Education Program's (NCEP) Adult Treatment
Panel (ATP) III definition of metabolic syndrome. Female
sex and advanced age were both risk factors for syndrome
X in this group.
REMOVING
THE X FACTOR
The metabolic syndrome patients generally had more risk
factors for heart failure than the other AMI patients
a fact that complicated the task of analysis.
It therefore came as little surprise that their in-hospital
fatality rate was more than twice as high, and their
heart failure rate nearly twice as high as the AMI patients
without the syndrome. But multivariate analysis was
able to tease out the particular contribution to risk
of each metabolic factor. By far the biggest culprit
was hyperglycemia, which was associated with a 3.3-fold
increase in heart failure risk.
Oddly, metabolic syndrome had no
apparent impact on rates of arrythmias or recurrent
AMI. But the syndrome was associated with higher rates
of cardiogenic shock, and to vascular damage in the
carotid artery and lower leg, suggesting that it could
also play a role in stroke and peripheral vascular disease.
AN
X-PLANATION?
How metabolic syndrome contributes to cardiovascular
disease remains open to speculation. "In patients with
diabetes," muse the authors, "several combined mechanisms
may contribute to the development of congestive heart
failure. Diastolic and/or systolic dysfunction associated
with diabetic cardiomyopathy, abnormal myocardial substrate
metabolism resulting in increased free fatty acid metabolism,
and impaired blood flow to the noninfarcted myocardium
are potential factors."
An Italian study led by Dr Roberto
Pontremoli from the University of Genoa and published
in the May issue of the Journal of Internal Medicine
puts forth a different theory. The research was aimed
at unearthing why hypertensive patients with metabolic
syndrome are at greater risk of cardiovascular disease.
The authors suggest that "an association between metabolic
syndrome and the presence of target organ damage provides
a rationale [for] the increased occurrence of cardiovascular
complications." Among the 354 hypertensive subjects
enrolled in the study, those with metabolic syndrome
were twice as likely to have microalbuminuria, left
ventricular hypertrophy or carotid abnormalities. For
more on this study, refer to the article "Why
metabolic syndrome plus hypertension equals heart trouble"
in our last issue.
For the moment, there seems little
that can be done for MI patients, except to follow the
authors' final injunction: "This study ... confirms
the importance of evaluating glycemic control during
the acute phase of MI."
Arch Intern Med May 23, 2005;165:1192-8
|