MAY 30, 2005
VOLUME 2 NO. 10
 

Managing incomplete miscarriages: what's better,
misoprostol or curettage?

Lower efficacy and higher pain bode ill for the drug,
but satisfaction soars when it does work


Carole P, a 35-year-old project manager, has just suffered a failed pregnancy at nine weeks. Besides coping with the attendant emotional pain, she's also been waiting for a week for the miscarriage to complete spontaneously. Now she has a difficult choice to make. Carole could either opt for curettage, the traditional approach where the lining of the uterus is scraped out, or she could take the drug route and try misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue most commonly used in gastric ulcer prevention, but also employed (somewhat controversially) to induce labour and early abortions. Since both treatments carry risks, she and her doctor are finding the decision far from easy.

A Dutch team based at the St Antonius Hospital in Nieuwegein, the Netherlands, recently set out to make the process a little simpler by comparing the two treatments in 154 women suffering from miscarriage, measuring outcomes and patient satisfaction. Their study was made available April 14 online in the journal Human Reproduction.

SUCCESS HIGHS AND LOWS
The researchers determined that misoprostol is successful in only 53% of patients where expectant management had failed. In contrast, curettage was successful in 96% of these cases.

Despite the lower efficacy of misoprostol, according to the article "some women are willing to trade a treatment burden and possible failure of misoprostol for the benefit of a non-invasive management" when the wait and see approach fails.

The study looked at 154 women aged 18 to 45, recruited from three teaching Dutch hospitals from November 2001 to June 2003. All were identified as having a gestational sac (with or without embryonic pole) through ultrasonography and had completed at least one week of unsuccessful expectant management after miscarriages occurring between six and 14 weeks gestation. Seventy-five of the women were treated with curettage, while 79 had four 200mg misoprostol tablets placed intravaginally (repeated after 24hrs if necessary). The women's satisfaction with their treatment and measures of quality of life related to their health were assessed by questionnaires.

While women in both groups were at their worst two days after treatment, the women in the misoprostol group experienced more pain than those in the curettage group, and perceived their general health to be poorer two and six weeks after treatment.

"The rather high failure rate for misoprostol treatment in our study remains a considerable problem," says Dr Giuseppe Graziosi, a gynecologist and one of the study's authors. But he adds, "Our somewhat low evacuation rate could partially be due to strict criteria on ultrasonographic evaluation."

BOTH HAVE A PLACE
Despite the findings, an equal percentage of women (58%) in either treatment group would undergo the same treatment in the future. However the authors note that for women in the misoprostol group "this choice depended on the initial success of misoprostol: in cases where misoprostol had caused complete evacuation, 76% of the women would opt for the same treatment, whereas only 38% of women who needed curettage after unsuccessful misoprostol would do so."

Dr Graziosi thinks that at the end of the day, the drug has its place in the array of treatments available. "When balancing the disadvantages of misoprostol (lesser effectiveness, higher chance of emergency curettage and overall lower health related quality of life) and advantages (higher satisfaction in case of complete evacuation and lower costs), there is a place for it in treating early pregnancy failure after unsuccessful expectant management." At present, however, "there are no clinical prognostic factors identified that are predictive for complete evacuation using misoprostol after failed expectant management."

He emphasizes counselling and shared decision-making for this traumatic experience. The negative psychological impact in terms of anxiety and depression of early pregnancy failure on a significant proportion of women is well documented, according to Dr Graziosi. "Counselling of the pros and cons of misoprostol treatment is of the utmost importance and the woman should make the final choice."

Hum Reprod published online Apr 14

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T. (514) 995-4398