MAY 30, 2005
VOLUME 2 NO. 10
 

Chlamydia not guilty of crimes of the heart

Bacterial infection, heart attack link shaky


It has all the makings of a great detective novel: an unsolved crime, plenty of evidence at the scene, a range of known suspects and one inconspicuous player lurking in the shadows. Atherosclerosis causes roughly half of all adult deaths in first world countries. Factors that increase risk, such as high cholesterol and smoking, are well known, but the cause in 40% of cases remains unsolved. In a search for new clues, recent research has pointed a finger at Chlamydia pneumoniae as a potential culprit in heart disease.

Reminiscent of the relationship between peptic ulcer disease and Helicobacter pylori, past research hints of a link between heart disease and several infectious agents, including herpes simplex, cytomegalovirus and coxsackie B virus. Other data support the idea that atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, leading researchers on a hunt for a microbial cause.

So how exactly does C pneumoniae fit into the big picture of heart disease? Is this microbe innocent or guilty as charged? Two recent studies give us some clues, bringing us closer to solving this mystery. In the first study published in the April 15 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, lead author Christine Arcari, PhD, of the University of Wisconsin, and colleagues, found that high levels of C pneumoniae antibodies in blood were associated with the occurrence of heart attack.

The researchers analyzed blood samples from 600 active-duty US military men aged 30-50. The cases were equally divided between men who had been hospitalized for a first heart attack and a group of controls matched for age, race and time of specimen collection. The association between high C pneumoniae antibodies and heart attack occurrence was particularly strong in blood collected one to five years before patients had their first heart attacks. By contrast, evidence of cytomegalovirus infection demonstrated no such association with acute myocardial infarction (MI). But does this prove there's a connection?

CONFLICTING EVIDENCE
"We don't understand how Chlamydia fits into the pathogenesis of [heart attacks]," admitted Dr Arcari in an earlier statement. "We don't fully understand why we're seeing this association on a biologic level." Previous studies of C pneumoniae and acute MI or coronary artery disease have had conflicting results —some trials had demonstrable associations between the bacterial infection and heart attacks, but not all of them showed this trend.

The organism first came under suspicion when Dr Pekka Saikku and colleagues published a study in October 1988 in The Lancet. The researchers showed that people with coronary artery disease were more likely than healthy control subjects to have circulating antibodies to C pneumoniae. They concluded in their study that "chronic chlamydial infection could be a factor in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases."

ALL IN THE FAMILY
Members of the Chlamydia family are responsible for a variety of diseases like chlamydia and conjunctivitis.

Instead of causing venereal disease, C pneumoniae leads to respiratory problems that resemble the flu and can progress to pneumonia or bronchitis. About 10% of pneumonia cases worldwide are linked to C pneumoniae infection. And now it seems that this microbe may also attack the heart.

However, Dr Arcari notes that we don't yet know whether or not ridding the body of the infection would have any beneficial effect on heart health. Given the correlation between bacterial infection with this strain and the incidence of heart disease, the idea that a simple antibiotic could be the ultimate cure for heart disease is a tantalizing one. But the answer is not that simple.

ANTIBIOTICS NOT THE ANSWER
A substantial, longterm study published in the April 21 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) weighs in against antibiotic therapy as a way to prevent the recurrence of cardiac-related events, including heart attacks, angina and stroke.

"The study followed the fates of 4,012 patients who took the antibiotic gatifloxacin or a placebo for up to two years after experiencing a cardiac event. The average age of participants was 58, and 22% were women. The trial was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sankyo — the makers of this medication.

The same proportion of participants taking gatifloxacin died and/or experienced another cardiac event (23.7%) as compared to those who took the placebo (25.1%). Likewise, none of the other factors measured in the trial, including antibody titers to Chlamydia and C-reactive protein, differed between the treatment and placebo groups.

Animal experiments have found that antibiotic therapy prevents the buildup of artery-clogging plaque, implying that Chlamydia triggers plaque formation. Research suggests that the bacterium invokes a vascular inflammatory response that may open the door for plaque formation.

TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE?
"Although Chlamydia pneumoniae may have played a role in starting the process of atherosclerosis, once patients have documented heart disease, it appears to be too late to treat the infection," said study author Dr Christopher Cannon from Harvard Medical School in a press release from the Brigham and Women's Hospital.

"Instead, we need to focus on reducing the cholesterol build-up and inflammation in the arteries, using high-dose statins — as shown in this same study — and other treatments."

In addition to monitoring cardiac health, the researchers measured antibody levels to Chlamydia throughout the trial. Treatment with antibiotic did not affect Chlamydia antibody levels, which suggests that the patients didn't have an active infection at the time. If there's no active infection then there's nothing for the antibiotic to kill.

Another trial published in the same issue showed the antibiotic azithromycin also failed to protect patients with stable coronary artery disease from a second cardiac event. So it may be time for researchers to stop thinking of bacterial infections as the bugaboo of cardiovascular disease. Until more pieces of this puzzle fall into place, physicians would do well to stick to proven treatments like statins, antiplatelet therapy, beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors.

NEJM Apr 21, 2005;352(16):1646-54
Clin Infect Dis Apr 15, 2005;40(8):1123-30

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.