MAY 15, 2005
VOLUME 2 NO. 9
 

RA meds trigger adverse reactions — and this
time it's not COX-2 inhibitors

Study confirms connection between tumour necrosis factor
inhibitors and skin disease


Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) sufferers have been served up a pretty raw deal this year, and it seems there's just no end to the bad news. Hot on the heels of the COX-2 controversy and the removal of Vioxx from the market, comes news that tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha-blocking agents cause skin disease in a quarter of RA patients treated with them.

"Dermatological conditions are a significant and clinically important problem in RA patients receiving TNF-alpha-blocking therapy," explain Dr Marcel Flendrie and colleagues from Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre in the Netherlands in their paper published April 4 in Arthritis Research & Therapy. Although skin conditions have been reported in clinical trials on these drugs, this is the first prospective cohort study that confirms the connection.

The study included 289 RA patients who were started on TNF-alpha-blocking treatment between June 1994 and December 2003. Each of these patients had a matched control with RA but no history of this type of treatment. Median followup time was 2.3 years.

TNF-alpha-blocking agents investigated in the study were the anti-TNF antibodies infliximab and adalimumab. The TNF-alpha receptors etanercept and lenercept were included as well. All "dermatological events" defined as any new onset of disease or exacerbation of a pre-existing skin condition were noted by the researchers.

GUILTY AS CHARGED
The study found that one-quarter of patients on TNF-alpha-blocking treatment needed to see a dermatologist. Of these, 26% had events severe enough to require treatment discontinuation. Visits to the dermatologist were significantly more frequent in this group than in the control group, only 13% of whom required a trip to the dermatologist. A significantly higher number of events occurred during active TNF-alpha-blocking therapy than afterwards, suggesting these agents were at least partially responsible. The most commonly recorded events were infections, eczema and drug-related eruptions.

Although frequent skin infections are normally seen in RA patients, the results of this study suggest that TNF-alpha-blocking agents increase the risk of these infections, particularly the risk of fungal infections and folliculitis. Given the important role TNF-alpha plays in the immune response, this isn't surprising. The specific shift in the immune response caused by TNF-alpha-blocking medications may also make RA patients more susceptible to eczema and other atopic disorders. This finding is especially interesting as the immuno-logical characteristics of RA normally protect against these disorders.

"The occurrence of dermatological events during TNF-alpha- blocking therapy is not restricted to RA patients," note the study authors. This conclusion is based on a separate analysis of 28 patients with non-RA rheumatic diseases conducted by the authors. In this group, dermatological reactions were also seen in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

The study findings could significantly influence the treatment of various rheumatological disorders. And the impact is likely to be even greater as more COX-2 inhibitors get pulled off the market. Given the frequency and severity of skin disease with the use of TNF-alpha-blocking agents, a further narrowing of treatment options may be a painful reality for many patients with rheumatic disease.

Arthritis Res Ther Apr 4, 2005;7(3):R666-76

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.