FEBRUARY 15, 2005
VOLUME 2 NO. 3
 

Implanted defibrillators keepn death at bay for CHF patients

Study also reveals shocking news that anti-arrythmic amiodarone
fares no better than placebo


While defibrillators look pretty nifty on TV shows, most of us would place them in the "don't try this at home kids" category without too much thought. However, "at home" is just the place defibrillation would do the most good for congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. Thanks to a study in the January 20 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), CHF patients in distress may soon be able to receive defibrillation immediately from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) — a pager-size device implanted in the chest. Recommendation for their use was sparked by the study's results which show that ICDs can prevent sudden death — they even fared significantly better than the anti-arrythmic drug amiodarone.

SHOCK TO THE HEART
Sudden cardiac events are the leading cause of death among CHF patients. ICDs help prevent this by detecting periods of arrythmia and administering an electrical shock to get the heart back on track. "The goal was to treat only rapid, sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation," explains lead author Dr Gust H Bardy of the Seattle Institute for Cardiac Research.

The numbers that came out of this study show that ICDs not only do what they were designed to do, they do it well. The Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) involved 2,521 patients with CHF. These patients were split evenly into three treatment groups — conventional therapy plus amiodarone, conventional therapy plus placebo, or conventional therapy plus ICD.

There were only 182 deaths in the ICD group, 23% fewer than in either of the other two treatment groups, both of which had more than 240 fatalities. In fact, amiodarone appears to have no survival benefits, as the mortality rate of the group taking it was just as high as that of the placebo group during the four-year study.

CHEAP LIFE SAVERS
Not only are ICDs effective, but the single-lead ICD is also relatively inexpensive. So despite the risk of complications during the implantation procedure, which occur in about 10% of patients, Dr Bardy suggests that "the survival benefit associated with simple, shock-only ICD therapy outweighs any shortcomings of this approach."

The news that ICD treatment improves survival will be encouraging for the nearly six million North Americans with CHF. At present, CHF is the most common diagnosis in hospital patients aged 65 and older, and half of all newly diagnosed patients die within five years of diagnosis. The lucky few who are alive, like US vice president Dick Cheney, owe their good fortune to ICDs. But as Dr Bardy claims, this latest research may "raise the standard of care for many patients with CHF," allowing more of those six million sufferers into the fortunate fold.

NEJM Jan 20, 2005;352:225-37

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.