JANUARY 30, 2005
VOLUME 2 NO. 2
 

BEHIND THE TITLE: HOSPITALISTS

Temporary guardian angels

Hospitalists look after your inpatients when you can't.
Who are these docs-for-hire?


When Myrna M was admitted to hospital with pneumonia last month, she expected her longtime GP would treat her. Instead a complete stranger — a physician working as a hospitalist — looked after her while she was an inpatient. Myrna wasn't exactly thrilled at first. But after a while she bonded with her new doc and was sorry to say goodbye to him when she was discharged.

In hospitals across Canada, hospitalists are becoming a more and more common sight, on hand to look after inpatients of doctors who, for one reason or another, don't have hospital privileges. Hospitalists come from all walks of physician life — retired docs who want to keep a foot in the door, or younger doctors not ready to commit to a permanent practice.

"In Peterborough, many of our current hospitalists are physicians who are part time hospitalists, part time primary care still," says Dr Renwick Mann, secretary treasure of the Peterborough County Medical Society and an anesthetist at Peterborough Regional Health Centre who works with a lot of hospitalists. "But a lot of hospitalists here gave up their community practice." He adds, "The whole issue is a spin-off of the medical manpower human resource problem that we're in at the moment."

He says there are many reasons hospitals employ hospitalists, and as many reasons doctors decide to become hospitalists. "There's no question the hospitalist model has provided more consistent access for physicians to care for patients while they're in hospital. Hospitalists can see patients through from start to finish, until they are discharged," he explains. "Also the salary structure and the workload in terms of time commitment is such that for many the hospitalist role was quite appealing."

We spoke to one family medicine specialist, Dr Joshua Tepper, who works as a hospitalist at Kirkland Lake Regional Hospital, to find out what he does and why he does it.

National Review of Medicine: Why are you working as a hospitalist? Why not just open a family practice?
Dr Joshua Tepper: I'm pragmatic to the degree that I'm not ready to open a longterm family practice until my wife is done with her training (in psychiatry). There isn't the same initial investment and ongoing monthly investment as there would be for a family doctor starting a practice. Plus there's currently a strong need for hospitalists for people who don't have a family doctor or whose family doctor does not participate in hospital-based care.

NRM: How do you like the work?
Dr Tepper: Most of the time I'm working in teams, with a social worker and physiotherapist and discharge planners. I really enjoy the teamwork and the focus on the patient. I work with nurses on the ward almost around the clock. And I like that collegiality with other doctors, trying to solve problems. I get to deal with patients and their families in a very direct way, because usually when someone is in hospital they're very sick. I really enjoy that family contact.

NRM: But as a hospitalist, can you establish a longterm relationship with a patient?
Dr Tepper: I see that patient every day until they're discharged, and we may involve a specialist as well. Hospitalists practise very good medicine with some very sick patients — the skills we have shouldn't be underestimated.

NRM: Do you think the presence of hospitalists encourages doctors to give up their hospital privileges?
Dr Tepper: I think it's the other way around: the absence of family doctors in hospitals is encouraging more doctors to become hospitalists. Because family doctors are making the decision to not to be as involved in hospital care, it may have created a vacuum that hospitalists are filling.

On the other hand, I don't think the presence of hospitalists is keeping doctors away from hospitals. Because I'm there doesn't stop a family doctor from looking after their patients. In some larger urban settings, I understand there have been rules and regulations that limit the role of family doctors in hospitals, and those situations seem unfortunate.

We also need to do more to encourage family doctors to either get back into hospitals or stay in hospitals. Having family physicians involved in family settings is important.

NRM: Why do you think doctors choose to become hospitalists?
Dr Tepper: They may find that lifestyle more suited to what they're interested in. To some degree, they'll have more defined hours. They can be long hours including night-time responsibility, but it might be more predictable and not necessarily as long term a commitment as an individual in family practice. It's very different from family practice where you're responsible for patients for a longterm basis.

NRM: How do you see the hospitalist's role evolving?
Dr Tepper: This will depend. In a small community that might be having a huge shortage of family doctors, you may simply see hospitalists looking after patients who have to be admitted but have no family doctor.

In a more urban area, it might be unreasonable to expect family doctors to do in-hospital care when their patients are spread across five or six hospitals. In this case, the doctor might have privileges in one hospital and hospitalists could look after their patients in other hospitals. This is the type of scenario where you'll really see hospitalists and family doctors working closely together.

The hospitalist's role could also evolve as the coordinator between several doctors. I had one patient this weekend who was under the care of three or more specialists, and it was my job to coordinate this patient's care. Normally, this would have been the family doctor's role.

Interviews conducted by Marjo Johne

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.