JANUARY 15, 2005
VOLUME 2 NO. 1
 

Doctors add two cents to NB sex ed debate

Cultures clash as 'get real' faction faces off with pro-abstinence group


"It's an assault on our children," says Dr Carolyn Barry, a family practitioner from the small town of New Maryland, NB. What's got her hot under the collar is the sex ed portion of the new Health Education Curriculum that has produced a storm of controversy since it was introduced to New Brunswick middle schools this past September.

The new curriculum is a comprehensive approach to sex education and provides teachers with resource material to enable them to cover any and all issues related to sexual health and sexual activity that may arise in classroom discussions — including oral sex, anal sex and masturbation.

ABSTINENCE OR BUST
"The materials used are quite graphic," says Dr Barry. "The curriculum doesn't take into account the nature of children, but assumes that a child is a sexual being with sexual needs from birth."

Dr Barry doesn't see this comprehensive approach to sex education as leading to fewer risky behaviours among teens. Quite the contrary. "The program takes for granted that children will have multiple partners," she says. Dr Barry also thinks the current practice of telling adolescents that condoms will protect them from disease is tantamount to lying. "The human papillomavirus (HPV) is small enough to go through the pores of a latex condom," she says, adding that this is serious business since HPV is highly contagious, causes genital warts and is linked to cervical cancer.

Dr Barry believes that an abstinence-based curriculum would be much more effective and less harmful. "There are some wonderful, well-documented abstinence-based curriculums out there," she says.

Protestors across the province agree with her. They've been out picketing and letter writing — and raising the ire of New Brunswickers who think that their kids' health depends on a strong sex education base.

THEY'RE ALREADY DOING IT
Dr Christine Davies, a family physician from New Brunswick's largest city, Saint John, agrees that abstinence should be strongly emphasized in sexual health curriculums, and students advised to postpone sexual activity. But she also believes that abstinence-based programs don't work, and is convinced that the new comprehensive curriculum is necessary.

"There is good research to show that young teens exposed to an explicit sexual education program postpone sexual activity longer and have fewer unwanted pregnancies," says Dr Davies, who also works at Saint John's Sexual Health Clinic. "There is evidence in favour of good quality sex education enhancing teenagers' ability to make good sexual decisions, to postpone sexual activity and to use birth control when they do start."

She thinks it's necessary that curriculum material be as detailed and explicit as possible, even for kids as young as 10. "I know from my clinical practice that one of the favourite activities among 11-and-12 year-olds in Saint John when unsupervised is an oral sex party," says Dr Davies. She adds that she believes many parents are blissfully unaware of what some of their children talk about, think about and do.

In response to protests, the NB Department of Education is reviewing the curriculum; they'll make their decision in January.

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.