JANUARY 15, 2005
VOLUME 2 NO. 1
 

Hands off the mediastinal masses

Docs are jumping the gun when they put patients with
lung tumours under the knife


Neither 'hands-off' nor 'conservative' are words that can be used to describe Professor Eli Wusch. So when a computed tomography (CT) lung cancer screen revealed a mass in the 75-year-old chain smoker's mediastinum, Eli concurred with his doctor that it was better to take an aggressive approach. He opted to have the mass surgically excised and have done with it — despite the risks inherent in the invasive procedure. However, as reported at the recent Radiological Society of North America's 90th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting held in Chicago, these lesions may be better handled by a hands-off, conservative approach. Eli wouldn't approve, why should we?

Well, the evidence provided is quite compelling. First of all, the findings are based on a large study group. Data from 9,286 baseline CT scans and 9,992 screenings done a year later were used. Of the 9,286 people examined, scans detected 128 mediastinal masses (about 1.4% of the scans). Over 90% of the masses were found in folks over 60.

Secondly, despite the fact that patients in this trial were all at high risk of lung cancer due to their longterm smoking or advanced age, only 20% of thymic masses under 3cm in diameter had increased in size one year later at the followup exam. Moreover, no change was evident in 72% of the masses and 8% actually shrank.

PUT DOWN THE KNIFE
So while some physicians who were consulted about the findings thought that the surgical option should be pursued, presenter Dr Claudia Henscke of Weill Medical College of Cornell University in Ithaca, NY believes that the "research suggests that mediastinal masses found in the context of CT screening for lung cancer in asymptomatic people should be approached in a conservative manner, as most did not increase in size and some even decreased in size."

The take-home message from Dr Henscke's presentation was not to be too hasty in wielding the knife in response to a mediastinal mass. "I think that these lesions should be left alone, too," said session chair Dr Robert Tarver, of Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis. "They're slow-growing lesions and are probably not going to do anything bad to the patient."

Surgery might not really accomplish much anyway, according to Dr Tarver. He noted that one lesion that was excised turned out to be esophageal cancer. Even if this type of cancer is detected and dealt with early, the patient's outlook is not too rosy.

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.