|
Back-to-school time for MDs too?
Physician competency is taking
fire from all sides. An editorial in the August 17 CMAJ
(see the cover story "Should you be forced to keep
up to date?") and coverage in the Globe and Mail
and elsewhere directly attack the current system
for evaluating and improving physicians' skills. The
solution to this problem, they say, is regular recertification
to reduce medical errors and help doctors keep abreast
of the latest medical research.
While medicine ? like all professions
? has its share of people of questionable ability, most
physicians are doing the best they can with limited
time and resources. Studying for re-examination takes
time away from patients and throws further bureaucratic
obstacles at the already overburdened Canadian physician.
Let's not forget that we're a nation suffering from
a physician shortage. Launching a recertification program
at a time when we need more doctors certainly won't
improve our lot. More likely it will discourage physicians
from remaining in practice in Canada.
Public ire at adverse events, especially
if they were preventable, is usually directed solely
at the physician. But this isn't always justified. Cases
like that of Dr Jon Witt ? the ER doctor who blew the
lid off critical understaffing at a Saskatoon hospital
? reveal a very different picture of how medical errors
can occur. Canadians are getting hip to these cracks
in the system. The latest CMA report card shows a drop
in national satisfaction with healthcare (refer to "Canada's
dismal healthcare report card"). The decidedly less
than stellar grade also reinforces a clear need to fix
the system. Will mandatory recertification solve
this problem? It may only serve to strengthen the view
that medical errors are due to physician incompetence
when, in fact, the problem is much more complex.
Then there are those who feel that
CME programs are an inadequate way to judge competency.
Granted, these are legitimate concerns ? simply clocking
time spent at conferences is no way to gauge skill.
But CME was never meant to do that. It was set up to
encourage the continuation of the learning process and
disseminate the latest medical research. How will recertification
improve this? It may succeed in evaluating certain skills,
but a physician's dedication, commitment to learning
and self improvement, professionalism and ethical behaviour
can't be judged by a simple test. These are personal
decisions that individuals choose to honour ? they can't
be taught or empirically measured.
? Shereen Joseph, Editor
|