JULY 30, 2004
VOLUME 1 NO. 14
 

Those forced to scrimp on drugs pay with their health

Dodging magic bullets -- patients who cut down on meds
for any reason are living dangerously


Things can be pretty tight financially for many elderly patients, and scrimping and saving may be a life long habit that's hard to break. But new research, published in the July issue of Medical Care, has confirmed that those who tighten their purse strings when it comes to prescription medications are paying a heavy price in terms of their health.

A team from the University of Michigan followed nearly 8,000 older adults who were on regular prescription meds. After three years, those who had cut back on their drugs because of cost were 76% more likely to suffer a significant decline in their overall health, and had 50% more risk of heart attacks, strokes or episodes of angina. Not exactly surprising? True, but it's the first time the negative health impact of cutting back on meds for economic reasons has been measured.

"Other studies have suggested that this effect might exist, but only by looking at a snapshot of a population at a moment in time," says author John Piette, PhD. "It's not possible to randomize people to cut back on their necessary medications, so this is the next best thing."

Cardiovascular disease and depression were the conditions most likely to deteriorate in patients who skimped on medicines. In this group, 8.2% had suffered a non-fatal heart attack or stroke by the end of the study, compared with 5.3% of those who hadn't cut back. Among older patients with depression, those who had difficulty paying for drugs were 16% more likely than others to deteriorate by at least one point on a standard diagnostic scale.

Changes to US Medicare will see some prescription drugs covered for the elderly, but lead author Dr Michele Heisler noted that in this study, it was patients in their 50s -- too young for Medicare drug coverage -- who were most likely to reduce medication due to cost concerns. "A lot of critics are saying it's too expensive to provide or improve drug coverage, but studies like this show that the downstream costs from adverse health outcomes later may be more expensive than the upstream costs now," she said. "It may be pay now, or pay more later."

Surprisingly, medication costs actually consume more of the healthcare bill in Canada (16.2%) than in the US (12.4%) -- due more to increased consumption than rising prices. At the same time, the proportion paid by the public purse is growing. But it remains to be seen if our government will react to rising costs in the same way as America's seniors have, with similarly unfortunate results.

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.