JUNE 30, 2004
VOLUME 1 NO. 13
 

A plague by any other name

New research claims the infamous Black Death wasn't caused by bubonic plague — or flea-bitten rats — after all. Brace yourselves for a viral comeback


The case of the biggest medical story of the last millennium just got reopened. Professor Christopher Duncan and Dr Sue Scott, of the University of Liverpool, have dropped an epidemiological bombshell with their upcoming book Return of the Black Death: The World's Greatest Serial Killer. Using detailed analysis of the microbial and historical evidence they argue that, contrary to established theory, the historic scourge known as the Black Death wasn't caused by bubonic plague, but a yet-to-be-identified virus.

The authors -- Professor Duncan is a zoologist, Dr Scott a social historian -- also manage to exonerate the Oriental rat and its much-maligned travelling companion, the Xenopsylla cheopis flea, by arguing it was actually travelling humans who spread the Plague. The scope and swiftness of the Black Death was possible in 14th century Europe, they say, thanks to the virus' extraordinarily long incubation period. What's more, the authors feel it's entirely plausible that this Black Death could make a comeback.

GOD'S LITTLE TOKEN
Bubonic plague, a disease caused by the Yersinia bacteria, has long been widely accepted as the cause of the Black Death. But for some scientists, it never quite fit the many detailed primary accounts of the Black Death.

"It was instantly recognized at the time of the Black Death in 1347 that the disease was directly infectious person to person," says Dr Scott, "and this view persisted until the end of the 19th century when bubonic plague was discovered and the story of rats and fleas being responsible for the Black Death was invented."

The authors examined countless chronicles and medical reports from the Plague period and noticed something. "The detailed clinical descriptions of hemorrhagic plague in no way fit with those of bubonic plague," says Professor Duncan. "The characteristic symptoms of hemorrhagic plague were 'God's tokens,' spots on the chest resulting from hemorrhaging beneath the skin. These aren't found in bubonic plague victims."

"Our work with the English parish registers that were maintained during a plague epidemic revealed to us that the disease had the following characteristics: a latent period of 12 days; a 20-day infectious period before appearance of symptoms and a five-day period of symptoms before death," Professor Duncan continues. "This long incubation period shows how the diseasecould spread over hundreds of miles even in the days of limited transport. It also corresponds exactly with the quarantine period that the Italian health authorities worked out by trial and error 600 years ago." It goes without saying that rats and fleas seldom pay heed to quarantine orders. Their conclusion? "Bubonic plague was never established in Europe."

RAISED HACKLES
The ink barely had time to dry before Return of the Black Death was publicly dismissed by Plague expert Dr Michael Smith of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. He publicly stated, "the body of evidence suggests that it was bubonic plague" and pointed to recent French research that looked at the DNA of exhumed Black Death victims and found evidence of bubonic plague.

Professor Duncan and Dr Scott are unmoved by Dr Smith's criticism: "Michael Smith has given the typical knee-jerk response of someone who has not read any of our work," they retort. They feel the French research was "completely discredited" by the article "Absence of Yersinia pestis-specific DNA in human teeth from five European excavations of putative plague victims," published in the February issue of Microbiology.

WHAT TO BELIEVE?
For people left scratching their heads and wondering who to believe, there are always the primary accounts to fall back on. For example, Marchione di Coppo Stefani's Florentine Chronicle, written in the late 1370s, observes the medical response to the Black Death: "Physicians could not be found because they had died like the others. And those who could be found wanted vast sums in hand before they entered the house. And when they did enter, they checked the pulse with face turned away. They inspected urine from a distance with something odoriferous under their nose."

Samuel Pepys was the great chronicler of the miseries of the 17th century Plague of London, one of the last outbreaks. On August 31, 1665 he offers this grim report in his diary: "In the City died this week 7,496, and of them 6,102 of the plague. But it is feared that the true number of the dead this week is near 10,000; partly from the poor that cannot be taken notice of."

Professor Duncan and Dr Scott feel there's strong evidence for five outbreaks of a Black Death-type virus in recorded history. The first occurred in Mesopotamia from 700 to 400 BC; then during the Plague of Athens of 430 BC; next the Plague of Justinian from AD 541 to AD 700; then the plagues of Islam in AD 627 to AD; and finally the 14th- to 17th-century Black Death. "If the virus is still lying dormant in its animal host in Africa, it could, potentially, reappear at any time," says Dr Scott. "After all, over 30 new emergent diseases have appeared since 1970."

Return of the Black Death: The World's Greatest Serial Killer (John Wiley & Sons Canada) is available in Canada as of June 25.

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.