|
Get them CHEKed out
CHEK2 gene implicated in breast
cancer risk along
with BRCA1 and 2
By Owen Dyer
Villains usually come in duos �
Bonny and Clyde, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid,
Bush and Cheney. The same goes for the notorious breast
cancer genes BRCA1 and 2, right? Unfortunately, that's
no longer true 'cause this duo just got a third partner
in crime. A study published in the June issue of the
American Journal of Human Genetics suggested
that a faulty copy of the CHEK2 gene doubles the risk
of developing breast cancer. The research brings us
closer to developing a comprehensive genetic test for
breast cancer risk, but the authors believed there are
still more genetic criminals that have yet to be caught.
CHEK2 has been suspected of a role
in carcinogenesis fora while. The study, led by Cancer
Research UK's Genetic Epidemiology Unit at the University
of Cambridge, tested 10,860 breast cancer patients and
9,065 healthy women in the UK, Australia, Finland, Germany
and the Netherlands for faulty versions of the gene.
The variant CHEK2 gene was found in 201 of the cancer
patients, but only in 64 of the healthy controls. This
suggested that the faulty gene elevates risk by a factor
of slightly more than two. Unlike the BRCA genes, however,
CHEK2 appears to be concentrated in younger patients.
CHEK2 also contrasts with the BRCA
genes in that its effect seems to be independent of
family history of the disease. Patients who carry faulty
BRCA genes are only deemed at increased breast cancer
risk if they have a family history.
This complicates identifying patients
who would benefit from genetic screening in the case
of CHEK2. Dr Doug Easton, who led the research, said:
"Women with a strong family history of breast cancer
can already receive genetic tests for the BRCA genes.
As we identify more genes that impact on hereditary
breast cancer, we move closer to a comprehensive genetic
test to accurately assess the risk of inheriting the
disease." However, with CHEK2 there's no rationale for
concentrating screening in a population, and a screening
program for all women is not exactly cost-effective.
Faulty versions of CHEK2 are also
rarer than faulty BRCA genes. While the BRCA variants
are implicated in about 10% of breast cancers, the proportion
of cases attributable to CHEK2 would be nearer to 1%.
The researchers believed, however, that other low-risk
genes exist and that if more could be identified, a
single genetic test could eventually help paint a fairly
accurate picture of a patient's breast cancer risk.
Professor Robert Souhami, director
of Clinical and External Affairs at Cancer Research
UK, said: "Identifying the first of a new set of breast
cancer genes puts us in a much better position to tackle
breast cancer, both through testing high-risk groups
and eventually through new clinical strategies."
|